[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Editorial: FAA should let healthy U.S. airline pilots fly until they reach 65"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:00:34 -0500
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
The Federal Aviation Administration should let healthy U.S. airline pilots
fly until they reach 65.
The Houston (TX) Chronicle
For almost 50 years the Federal Aviation Administration has required U.S.
airline pilots to retire at age 60. The policy lacks a medical rationale,
discriminates against American pilots and should be speedily changed.
FAA regulators grant waivers to most foreign airline pilots between the ages
of 60 and 65, but decline to do the same for U.S. pilots. The officials cite
general policy difficulties, but reluctance to get crosswise with the
airlines is no excuse for not doing the right thing by America's pilots,
many of whom are veterans of Vietnam and other conflicts.
In January, FAA Administrator Marion Blakey said the time had come to end
mandatory retirement at 60. She said the FAA had examined safety data and
could find no evidence that pilots who reach 60 are any less safe than
younger pilots. Several hundred pilots older than 60 fly corporate jets,
where they are not restricted.
It's good that she has set the process in motion, but years of bureaucratic
torpor and formal rule-making procedures could pass before the change takes
The solution is for the FAA to grant U.S. pilots approaching 60 the same
waivers it grants older foreign pilots flying into, out of and around U.S.
airports. Safety would not be affected, and the pilots would remain in the
cockpit, where they are needed to counter a looming pilot shortage.
The United Nations' Civil Aviation Organization allows one pilot between the
60 and 65, so long as the other pilot is under 60. This seems a reasonable
mix of vigor and experience.
The time has passed when a rule change could help Fedex Captain Steven E.
Collins, who turned 60 in May. Collins shared his story in a letter to the
Chronicle editorial board, which calmly demonstrates the injustice and
capriciousness of the over-60 rule:
"I served as an Army helicopter pilot from 1966-1971, flying combat missions
in Vietnam in 1968 and 1970. From 1974-1990 I was a Navy fighter pilot
deployed on aircraft carriers to hot spots around the world. In 1990 I
retired as executive officer of the Navy Fighter Weapons School, better
known as "Top Gun."
"In 1990 I joined Fedex as a flight crewmember and rose to captain, based in
Anchorage, Alaska. ... It will be 18 months or two years before a proposed
new rule will take effect. In the interim, more than 5,000 American
commercial pilots will be forced to retire at age 60. ...
"Please inform the American public of this horrible wrong."
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org