[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Panel: pilot distraction caused crash"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:21:40 -0600
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Panel: pilot distraction caused crash
By LESLIE MILLER
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) - The fatal crash of a small jet owned by Circuit City
Stores Inc. was blamed on the pilots flying the airplane too slowly, the
National Transportation Safety Board ruled Tuesday.
On Feb. 16 last year, the pilots were dealing with ice on the wings and a
runway change as they approached the airport at Pueblo, Colo. The
twin-engined jet stalled and plunged into the ground, killing the two-man
crew and six passengers.
Investigators concluded the pilots failed to notice the airplane had slowed
to an unsafe speed. Board member Steven Chealander said the flight crew was
paying attention, but not to the right thing.
"I feel this was a responsible flight crew," Chealander said. "I feel they
got themselves distracted. They were just off their game."
The Cessna Citation C-560 was stopping to refuel when it crashed during a
flight from Virginia to California. Both pilots, four employees of the
electronics retailer, and two representatives of other companies died in the
There was freezing drizzle and fog in the area, and flight crews aboard
three other planes had reported icing conditions. Ice accumulating on wings
can disturb the smooth air flow needed to keep an airplane aloft.
Airplanes need to fly faster when ice accumulates on the wings, but the
Circuit City aircraft was actually decelerating. A warning system on the
airplane failed to activate in time to alert the pilots to their danger,
The pilots also should have activated the de-icing equipment more frequently
while they were approaching the airport, the safety board concluded.
As a result of the accident, the NTSB wants the Federal Aviation
Administration to change the standards for how pilots are trained and the
guidance they're given for icing conditions.
"The issue here is for pilots to be trained to recognize the most important
thing is always 'First, fly the airplane,'" said NTSB Chairman Mark
The safety board also wants the FAA to change the standards for de-icing
David Coffman of Richmond, Va., was one of the Circuit City employees who
perished in the crash. He left four children, now 6, 5 and twins aged 3.
Coffman's wife, Tricia, said after Tuesday's NTSB hearing that she
appreciated the investigators' efforts.
"My hope is that this accident will be the one to cause the FAA to look at
the icing issues and make the proper changes," Coffman said.
FAA spokesman Les Doerr said the agency agrees with the intent of the NTSB's
safety recommendations. "We'll examine them carefully," Doerr said.
Within five months of the Circuit City crash, several other corporate
aircraft were involved in fatal accidents. Among them:
-On Oct. 24, 2004: A plane owned by the Hendrick Motorsports organization
crashed in Martinsville, Va., on its way to a NASCAR race, killing all 10
-On Nov. 22, 2004: Three crewmembers of a Gulfstream G1159A died after
crashing into a light pole just south of Houston Hobby airport; they were en
route to picking up former President George H.W. Bush.
-On Nov. 28, 2004: A charter plane carrying NBC Sports Chairman Dick Ebersol
crashed and burst into flames during takeoff from a southwest Colorado
airport, killing three people including Ebersol's son Teddy.
The NTSB ruled all three crashes were caused by pilot error.
Robert Breiling, a Boca Raton, Fla.-based aviation consultant, says the
accident rate for business jets is comparable to that of scheduled
For all professionally flown business airplanes, there were four fatal
accidents in 2006, three in 2005 and five in 2004.
The number of private aircraft flown by professional pilots has been growing
fast. There were 7.9 percent more business jets in 2005 than in 2004; for
the previous four years, the fleet increased by about five to six percent
annually, Breiling said.
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com