[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Report: 3,400 Airspace Violations Since 9/11"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:58:58 -0500
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Report: 3,400 Airspace Violations Since 9/11
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON - Pilots flew into restricted airspace 3,400 times across the
country in the three years following the Sept. 11 attacks, according to a
congressional report that says the government needs to better coordinate its
response to such violations.
One agency should be in charge of steering planes away from restricted
zones, according to the Government Accountability Office report, obtained by
The Associated Press ahead of Thursday's hearing on the subject by the House
Government Reform Committee.
Committee Chairman Tom Davis, a Virginia Republican, said it's essential for
agencies that oversee the skies to work together.
"A quick, coordinated response is absolutely vital if we are faced with a
pilot or a plane with hostile intent," Davis said in a statement.
The Federal Aviation Administration, the North American Aerospace Defence
Command and the Transportation Security Administration are responsible for
making sure pilots don't fly where they shouldn't.
Jets have been scrambled more than 2,000 times since the terrorist attack on
Sept. 11, 2001, including several well-publicized incidents during which
private planes strayed into the restricted zone over Washington, causing the
evacuation of the White House, the Capitol and other government buildings.
The GAO said there is no single leader of the airspace security effort.
"Without central leadership, the potential exists for a somewhat slower
response to a violation as the agencies decide who is in charge while the
violating aircraft continues to operate in restricted airspace," the report
The report also said the agencies don't always share information about
airspace violations and don't define an airspace violation the same way.
All three agencies took strong exception to the report, saying the current
system works well.
"It's been a success," said Master Sgt. John Tomassi of NORAD. "Although
these things do happen, we can't prevent everything."
"The FAA takes all incursions very seriously," said agency spokesman Greg
Martin. "We'll continue to work with the GAO, other federal agencies and
Congress to strengthen airspace security even more through better
coordination, clarification and information sharing."
TSA spokesman Mark Hatfield said the agency is getting more efficient at
responding to airspace violations.
Since the terrorist attacks, the government has vastly expanded the amount
of airspace it restricts. Aircraft aren't allowed to fly over nuclear power
plants, chemical storage areas, military facilities, the nation's capital or
any area where the president is traveling, or events such as the Super Bowl.
On Wednesday, the FAA restricted airspace above wildfires in the West to
ensure the safety of airborne firefighting efforts.
The report noted that airspace violations are almost all inadvertent,
because a pilot is trying to avoid bad weather or doesn't check for notices
of the restrictions, as they're required to do.
Pilots flying private planes are responsible for 88 percent of the
violations, and most occur in the eastern United States, where air traffic
is heavy and there's a lot of restricted airspace.
Almost half the violations occur around Washington, where pilots aren't
allowed to fly in an area of about 2,000 square miles unless they have a
special identifying signal and maintain radio contact with the FAA.
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com