[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"House science panel backs increase in airport security funding"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:28:04 -0500
Thursday, June 14, 2007
House science panel backs increase in airport security funding
By Elaine S. Povich
The House Science and Technology Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics
approved a bill Thursday calling for increased funds for research and
development of the next generation of airport surveillance and security
The bill (H.R. 2698) provides a total of $1.8 billion over the next four
fiscal years for research and development of airport projects under the
jurisdiction of the Federal Aviation Administration. The total is
approximately $117.4 million more than President Bush's request for fiscal
Both Republicans and Democrats on the subcommittee were in agreement on the
measure, which now goes to the full committee for consideration. It was
approved on a voice vote with no audible dissent.
"This legislation is focused on ensuring the FAA will have the tools that it
will need to keep the nation's air transportation system safe, efficient,
and environmentally friendly," said Subcommittee Chairman Mark Udall,
D-Colo., who sponsored the bill.
A key portion of the legislation strengthens the Joint Planning and
Development Office, which has the responsibility for developing the next
generation of airport transportation systems. Those systems include human
factors, weather, unmanned aerial vehicles and environmental research, as
well as radar systems.
It requires the agency to come up with a plan to ensure that the new
transportation system meets anticipated future air transportation safety,
security, mobility, efficiency and capacity needs. In addition, the bill
calls for a plan to deal with incapacitation of the system in the event of a
natural disaster or terrorism.
Udall noted that environmental factors have become increasingly important in
air transportation, especially in other countries.
"Recent announcements from Europe regarding the potential imposition of
emissions penalties on aircraft operations in the next decade have also made
it clear that the U.S. needs to better understand the impact of aviation on
the climate as well as what might be done to mitigate that impact," Udall
Ranking subcommittee member Tom Feeney, R-Fla., also supported the
legislation, particularly considering the coming demands on the air traffic
"The FAA is a unique federal enterprise," he said. "Twenty-four hours a day,
seven days a week, it operates a complex nationwide network of
communications, navigation and surveillance systems upon which our civil,
military and general aviation aircraft are completely dependent. The
architecture of this system dates back 50 years. It is simply incapable, as
currently designed, of handling large increases in traffic."
Post your comments in the CAA Legislative Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com