[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"House plan for FAA won't have user fees"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:36:02 -0500
Thursday, June 7, 2007
House plan for FAA won't have user fees
President Bush had proposed that aviation user fees should pay for over half
the FAA budget.
By John Hughes
Washington - Aviation user fees won't be part of a House plan for funding
the Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation and Infrastructure
Chairman James Oberstar said.
Existing taxes can cover the FAA's budget and airport projects for the next
five years, Oberstar said in an interview. President Bush had proposed a fee
that would pay for more than half of the FAA's $14.1 billion budget.
"None of what the administration was proposing" will be included, Oberstar,
a Minnesota Democrat, said in Washington. "We're plotting a path to
achieving it without the administration's fees."
Small-plane owners opposed fees based on air-space use, fearing higher
Airlines and passengers pay two-thirds of costs now through taxes on
passenger tickets, fuel, cargo and frequent-flier miles.
Even without fees, airlines hope Congress will require corporate-jet users
to pay more, said David Castelveter, spokesman for the Washington-based Air
"We're tired of subsidizing corporate aviation," he said.
Oberstar said House lawmakers are still drafting an FAA proposal that will
be ready for an aviation subcommittee vote later this month.
A Senate panel passed its version of the plan May 16.
It includes a small-scale version of Bush's fee that, at $25 a flight, would
collect $400 million a year.
Bush didn't specify the amount of his fee.
Post your comments in the CAA Legislative Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com