[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Senate Panel Keeps New Flight Surcharge as It Approves FAA Reauthorization"
- From: "Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:40:37 -0500
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Senate Panel Keeps New Flight Surcharge as It Approves FAA Reauthorization
By Kathryn A. Wolfe
Congressional Quarterly Today
The commercial airline industry scored a victory Wednesday when a Senate
panel voted to protect a proposal for redistributing the cost of overhauling
the nation's air traffic control system.
The Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee gave voice-vote approval
to legislation (S 1300) to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration
at $65 billion through fiscal 2011, after defeating an amendment that would
have removed a provision to create a new $25-per-flight surcharge.
The airlines see the proposed surcharge, which would be paid by any plane
using controlled airspace, as a way to ensure that high-end business jets
and other general aviation interests shoulder a fair share of remaking the
nation's antiquated air traffic control system.
Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and John E. Sununu, R-N.H., offered the amendment that
would have struck the surcharge from the bill. The amendment was rejected,
If the surcharge becomes law, the money collected would be placed directly
into a new trust fund that could be used only to pay for modernizing the air
traffic control system. Piston-engine planes or turboprops operating outside
controlled airspace would be exempt. The committee said those aircraft
represent 90 percent of general aviation.
General aviation interests say the provision is unnecessary, arguing that
the current system of excise and ticket taxes works fine and that the bill
would essentially create corporate welfare for airlines.
Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, was the swing vote on the doomed amendment. He waited
until other members had voted before casting the deciding "nay."
Despite his vote, Stevens said he thinks "there is a bit of unfairness" in
terms of which flights would have to pay the surcharge. Earlier in the
markup, he said he was concerned that the bill would encourage Alaskans --
many of whom rely on aviation as a regular means of travel -- to switch back
to piston-engine planes, which are not as safe as turboprops. However, he
said he voted the amendment down in the interest of moving the measure to
John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., the chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee,
chastised business aviation interests for being reluctant to pay more for
usage of the air traffic control system. He suggested that if Congress
cannot enact the surcharge or another new fee, it may instead have to put
new restrictions on the use of airspace.
"Deal with that. Think about that," he said.
In what has become commonplace in FAA reauthorization bills in recent years,
lawmakers adopted, 12-11, an amendment that would increase the number of
slots at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Flights to destinations
1,250 miles beyond the airport's perimeter -- generally to Western states --
would be increased from 24 to 36 daily, and flights within the perimeter
would be increased from 20 to 28 daily.
The panel also adopted by voice vote a manager's amendment that made a
number of changes and additions, including expanding the types of customer
complaints the Transportation Department must investigate to include flight
cancellations, overbookings and lost luggage.
The FAA's current authorization (PL 108-176) expires in September. Senators
expressed concern that it might be tough to find floor time for the bill
The Finance Committee must mark up a piece of the bill dealing with aviation
fuel taxes. Rockefeller warned that Finance is not likely to raise fuel
taxes as a solution to the problem of updating the air traffic control
"If you expect the Finance Committee to raise fuel taxes . . . then wait a
long time," said Rockefeller, who is a member of that panel.
Post your comments in the CAA Legislative Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com