[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


"Advocates push U.S. Congress to ban profiling"

Monday, January 29, 2007

Advocates Push Congress to Ban Profiling
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The repercussions of an airline's decision to remove a group of
imams from a commercial flight in Minneapolis could be heard in Congress
this year, with civil rights groups pushing Democratic lawmakers to ban
racial profiling.

The incident happened in November, made national news and reinvigorated an
old proposal that got little attention from the GOP.

Now, a champion of the legislation, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., is chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction on the issue. Sen.
Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who sponsored legislation to ban racial profiling in
the last Congress, now chairs the Judiciary subcommittee on the

No bill has been introduced so far, but Feingold made it clear the issue
will be a priority for him.

"Many law-abiding African Americans, Arab Americans, Latino Americans and
others live with the fear of being racially profiled as they go about their
everyday lives," Feingold said. Although the vast majority of law
enforcement officers don't engage in the practice, he added, some do and it
must be addressed.

"I look forward to working with Chairman Conyers in the House as well as
others to ensure that no one is judged by how they look or where they
worship," he said.

Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington office, said he was
optimistic a bill could get through Congress.

"I'm convinced that once the body of evidence of racial profiling occurring
in our nation is presented before the U.S. Congress and the American people,
that indeed they'll be compelled to do something about it," he said.

Shelton said he's spoken about the issue with Conyers and is hopeful for
action on legislation soon, perhaps as early as next month. Conyers declined
to comment for this story.

Feingold's last bill would have banned federal, state and local law
enforcement officials from "relying, to any degree, on race, ethnicity,
national origin, or religion" during investigations.

An exemption would have been made for specific information that "links a
person of a particular race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion to an
identified incident or scheme."

Some security-oriented groups are gearing up to fight a new version of the

"It would have the effect of estranging police officers from the community
that they serve," said Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order
of Police. "It would make them more hesitant to stop people who might well
be in violation of the law for fear that they're going to get written up
because of some racial protocol."

Peter Gadiel, of Kent, Conn., president of 9/11 Families for a Secure
America, mocked the legislation.

"The 9/11 atrocity was committed by 19 young single men from Arab nations.
If you want to hand this country over to terrorists, why don't you say it
right out front?" said Gadiel, whose son, James, died in the attacks on the
World Trade Center. "We don't have to worry about 80-year-old ladies with
bleach-blonde hair and southern accents."

Steve Mustapha Elturk, an imam in Troy, Mich., said he would welcome a ban
on racial profiling. He said U.S. authorities have detained him four times
since Sept. 11, 2001, twice at the Canadian border and twice while traveling
by air, even though he has done nothing wrong.

"It is pathetic for an American citizen who has spent more than half his
life in this country to have to fly fearing that I will be stopped and
interrogated," said Elturk, 52, who was born in Lebanon. "This is not the
country I came to know."

Eric Blum, a Customs and Border Protection spokesman, said that while he
couldn't comment on specific cases, the agency does not use racial

"However, we will scrutinize cargo and individuals coming from high-risk
countries, no matter what your nationality," he said, adding that people can
also be detained if their name matches one on a watch list.

   Post your comments in the CAA Legislative Forum


Current CAA news channel:

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com