[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


"TSA Reorganization" Legislation Introduced in House of Representatives

“TSA Reorganization” Legislation Introduced in House of Representatives

Airport Legislative Alliance



To:                  AAAE/ACI-NA Chief Executives and Airport Operators on E-Mail Distribution


From:              Joel Bacon, 703-575-2478


Re:                  “TSA Reorganization” Legislation Introduced in House of Representatives


                        Date:               December 7, 2005 – Volume 11, Number 63 – 5 p.m.


                        The Republican leadership of the House Homeland Security Committee today introduced legislation to “reorganize” the Transportation Security Administration.  The bill, H.R. 4439, was sponsored by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-NY); Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Cybersecurity Subcommittee Chairman Dan Lungren (R-CA); and several other Republican members of the committee.  The text of the legislation, a press release on the legislation, and a video clip from a press conference held today by several of the bill’s sponsors can be viewed at: http://hsc.house.gov/. 


                        Among other things, the legislation would establish an “Airport Screening Organization” within TSA with the stated goal of “improving the delivery of federal security screening services” by “increasing efficiency, taking better advantage of new technologies, reducing unit costs, and responding more effectively to the needs of the traveling public, while enhancing aviation security.”  Additionally, the bill would establish transportation sector advisory councils for each mode of transportation under the jurisdiction of TSA to provide “advice and counsel” to TSA on “management policy, spending, and regulatory matters, including interim final rules.”  The advisory councils would conduct a coordinated review of the rulemaking and cost-benefit analysis processes of TSA and develop recommendations to improve the processes and ensure the public interest is fully protected.  Membership on the advisory council would be composed of experts in each transportation mode, including representatives of labor and management.  The bill also requires a report on non-screener personnel at airports and recommendations on the possible elimination of some of those positions as well as a report on recommendations for improving TSA’s acquisition management system.   


On other items of note, the bill proposes significant changes to the Screening Partnership Program (opt-out).  Specifically, the measure would require the establishment of standard operating procedures and specific requirements for security screening as well as a certification process for ensuring that “screening entities” operating under the program perform in accordance with those SOPs and screening requirements.  Once certified, the “screening entity” (a private screening company or airport most likely) would be entitled to “all litigation and risk management protections applicable thereto.”  Liability protections and defenses available to a certified screening entity would be extended to airport operators and other third parties.  Additionally, the bill would establish a “Share in Savings” program under which cost savings could be used by the airport to deploy better technology, including in-line EDS installation.  These items on expanding opt-out follow some of the concepts outlined by Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority President Jim Bennett in testimony before the committee earlier this year on behalf of AAAE and ACI-NA.  That testimony can be viewed at:  http://homeland.house.gov/files/TestimonyBennett.pdf


Expanding the opt-out program to make it more appealing to airport operators was one of the key benefits that Chairman Lungren highlighted today at the press conference, as the following article from CongressDaily highlights: http://www.aaae.org/_pdf/_govpdf/HomelandSec12705.pdf.  The article also notes that the bill does not have Democratic support at this time in part because provisions on cargo screening and rail and transit security were not included in the legislation.  


                        Sponsor’s Summary of Key Provisions

                        According to bill sponsors, the legislation:


·       Creates an independent, performance-based, results-oriented organization within

TSA to focus exclusively on airline passenger and baggage screening;

·       Establishes an autonomous Airport Screening Organization (ASO) to focus on

customer service, accountability, and cost reductions;

·       Appoints a Chief Operating Officer (COO) to manage the day-to-day operations

of the organization and ensure passengers receive the best customer service and most

secure screening procedures;

·       Creates industry-led advisory councils to help the best ideas of management and

labor reach decision-makers directly;

·       Requires TSA to develop a “Vetted Passenger List” that includes individuals

already cleared under other programs such as Registered Traveler, TWIC, SIDA, FAST,

and applicable federal security clearances;

·       Establishes a “culture of accountability” within all levels of TSA to improve the

effectiveness of airport security screening;

·       Encourages airports that decide to train their own passenger screening personnel

to invest in screening technology, equipment, and innovations—ultimately reducing

overall screening operations costs;

·       Returns most of the savings resulting from new technologies to the airport, in

order to encourage additional spending on advanced technologies and security programs;

·       Requires TSA to develop an accurate accounting and cost analysis for all TSA

programs in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective security programs;

·       Requires TSA to focus resources on the areas at highest risk of terrorist attacks;

·       Creates a program to instantaneously pre-screen all international passengers

traveling to the U.S.;

·       Removes hurdles that have prevented airline pilots from volunteering to become

armed Federal Flight Deck Officers;

·       Encourages the private sector to invest in cutting-edge transportation security


·       Sets new performance goals for TSA, state and local governments, and the private

sector to improve airport security;

·       Encourages state and local governments and federal contractors to compete with

TSA to provide the highest possible level of airport security; and

·       Creates new training standards for airport document checkers to recognize

unacceptable or fraudulent identification.



While there are a number of ATSA-related changes of importance to airports that are not addressed in the bill introduced today, the measure does include some important provisions that attempt to deal with issues the airport community has raised with the committee this year.  Among other things, the bill provides an avenue for additional airport involvement with TSA and the proposed ASO and enhances the opt-out program to provide more flexibility and a potential opportunity to creatively finance important technological improvements like EDS installation projects.


In terms of process, the Committee will likely consider the measure some time early next year.  Between now and then we will be actively working with the staff and Committee Members to press for additional airport priorities.  We will keep you apprised as the process moves forward.






Current CAA news channel:

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com