[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

         

Airport Compliance issue: definition of "employee"



The issue of what constitutes an "employee" in regards to an aircraft 
owner's ability to self-service his aircraft has raised its head here. 
At least one tenant (a flight school) would like to use an off-airport 
mech under contract to maintain its aircraft, claiming that giving the 
mech a contract and a 1099 for "wages" paid makes him an employee.  We 
have aircraft owners who I'm sure are doing the same thing (or would 
like to).

I'm well familiar with the FAA 5190 and I know what it says about 
self-service.  What I can't find is the regulatory definition, an 
interpretation, or other guidance from the FAA as to what constitutes an 
"employee" (i.e., someone whose employer pays social security, medicare, 
worker's comp) that I can apply to this issue.  As is usually the case 
with these things, I know I'll get the "prove me wrong" answer when I 
bring this up.  Can anyone point me in the right direction?  Does the 
FAA address this somewhere in another document?

As a side note, our airport commercial operating standards allow FBOs to 
use the "contract" arrangement as a way to use mechs to work on FBO 
customer aircraft.  I'm scratching my head about that - any comments? 
Does that seem kosher, or are we being inconsistent in allowing the FBOs 
to do that?

Cheers,
John Lawson, A.A.E.
Airport Manager

   Find past Mutual Help topics in the CAA Help Forum
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dc/dcboard.php

*****************************************

Current CAA news channel: