[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Supporters of closing Santa Monica Airport lose round in court"
- From: Stephen Irwin <stephen.irwin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:56:52 -0700
Thursday, August 21, 2014
Supporters of closing Santa Monica Airport lose round in court
By Dan Weikel
The Los Angeles (CA) Times
In a setback for opponents of Santa Monica Airport, a Los Angeles judge has
dismissed a lawsuit that challenged a November ballot measure to protect the
facility from closure..
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Luis A. Lavin threw out the case
filed in May by an anti-airport group that claimed Measure D was misleading,
poorly vetted by city officials and violated the state Constitution and
The initiative, which is backed by a coalition of airport supporters and the
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Assn., would require voter approval to shut down
the airport, alter its land use or restrict aviation-related activities.
Lavin, who ruled Tuesday afternoon, said there was no evidence that the city
clerk violated the elections code, that the measure's wording was false or
that the city attorney was incompetent in the preparation of the measure's
title and summary.
The judge also held that the anti-airport faction failed to cite any legal
authority prohibiting the City Council from advancing the ballot measure and
that one of the suit allegations should be addressed after the election.
Lavin noted that the plaintiffs sought to impede the initiative process and
force the city to abandon its neutral and ministerial role in processing
Attorney Jonathan Stein, who represented the anti-airport group, said he
disagreed with the judge and that the substance of the allegations was not
He said he would appeal the decision and pursue a second lawsuit he recently
filed with similar allegations. Stein noted that the Council "ended up being
a cheerleader for the AOPA" though it supports closing the airport.
In addition to the aircraft owners association, the defendants included the
Santa Monica city clerk, the Santa Monica City Council and the Santa Monica
"Regardless of the wisdom of AOPA's ballot measure, the lawsuit was
misguided and an unnecessary distraction," said Santa Monica Deputy City
Atty. Ivan Campbell. "We are pleased with the result, but it was a needless
waste of public resources and time."
Santa Monicans for Open and Honest Development Decisions, a sponsor of the
ballot measure, also criticized the case.
"It's clear that opponents of Measure D will try anything to prevent voters
from speaking," said David Shaby, an attorney and member of the pro-airport
group. "But it's just adding to the cost and delays we've seen from
frivolous litigation. Why are they so afraid of the voters deciding?"
Lavin's decision gives Santa Monicans, the city and the AOPA the right to
seek their legal fees and court costs from the plaintiffs. Members of Santa
Monicans said they are seriously considering it while city officials have
yet to decide.
Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org