[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"FAA Outlines Idaho Airport's Safety Shortcomings to Local Officials"
- From: Stephen Irwin <stephen.irwin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:21:36 -0700
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
FAA Outlines Burley Airport's Shortcomings to Local Officials
By LAURIE WELCH
The Twin Falls (ID) Times-News
BURLEY - A Federal Aviation Administration official assigned to the Burley
airport project spoke with officials of Cassia and Minidoka counties Monday
about the airport's shortcomings.
Concerns about moving the airport also were aired by airport users and
landowners at one of two proposed airport sites.
Aaron Higgens, who owns land near the Baseline site, said residents there
have spent their life savings building houses "to be away from the noise,
the traffic and the people."
Higgens said his property is not for sale and is right in the middle of the
proposed airport site.
Only a "very small percentage of people in the area use the airport," and
only a few of those favor building a new one, he said.
Steve Engelbrech, the FAA project manager and civil engineer, said the
airport fails to meet standards because it lacks sufficient safety areas at
the ends of the runways to protect aircraft and pilots and it doesn't have
object-free zones beyond the runways that protect other people and property.
While the length of the runways is not an FAA standard, in order to meet the
other standards, the airport's short runways would have to be reduced
"The quick and dirty reality is that to comply with standards, you'd have
2,500-foot-long runways," said Englebrech at the Minidoka County meeting. A
runway of that length would only accommodate the smallest planes.
In order to meet the required safety and object-free zones, the runways
would have to be extended west past Overland Avenue and the hospital to the
Engelbrech said the airport rates "fairly high" in its number of crashes in
relation to its number of flights.
Engelbrech told Minidoka commissioners that the National Transportation
Safety Board's reports on airplane crashes never list runway length as a
cause because it's always the pilot's decision whether to use an airport.
"We are certainly not saying if you met all the standards and had a
5,500-foot runway there would be no accidents. But we can make it safer," he
At airports that meet standards, eligible projects receive 90 percent
funding from the FAA, Engelbrech said. But by law, the FAA can't provide
funds for airports that fail to meet standards. The community would have to
decide if that type of airport is adequate, and the city would have to
provide the funds to maintain it.
The airport needs a couple of million dollars in asphalt work, Engelbrech
said. The airport asphalt has not had any major improvements in more than 20
By 2021, the aprons and taxiways will fail and will need to be completely
rebuilt. The remainder of the asphalt will be in poor condition.
"I think the FAA has not done a good job being involved in the process up to
this point," said Engelbrech.
"One thing the airport users are concerned about is the community as a whole
underestimating the value of the airport," said Jack Hunsaker, president of
the Burley Airport Users Association, formed by local pilots. "Anytime we
hit a roadblock, the response is just: 'We'll shut the airport down, and
that's it.' And we're concerned that people don't really appreciate the
economic impact of the airport."
Many people use the airport, and it's not just a playground for spoiled rich
kids, he said.
Hunsaker said the group opposes both proposed relocation sites but does not
oppose relocation per se.
"Most of the users are fine with the length of the runways," said Hunsaker.
Cassia County Commissioner Bob Kunau asked if the FAA would reclassify all
community airports that lack runway buffer zones.
Engelbrech said the FAA is only concerned with airports that are eligible
for federal money. Many small "back-country" airstrips do not qualify for
funds and do not have to meet those requirements.
The FAA will not close the airport, he said. It will simply stop providing
money for improvements or maintenance, which would place that burden
entirely on the shoulders of Burley taxpayers.
On the web:
Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com