[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


"Grand jury finds lack of funds at Yuba County Airport"

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Grand jury finds lack of funds at Yuba County Airport
By Eric Vodden 
The Marysville (CA) Appeal-Democrat

Yuba County is being asked by a grand jury committee to put more money into
the airport to fix conditions it describes as "unsafe and very unsightly."

In a letter to the Board of Supervisors, the county committee of the grand
jury notes deficiencies at the 600-acre Olivehurst facility. They include
signs missing or in poor repair, erased lines for taxiways and locations
covered with tall grass and weeds.

"The grand jury finds insufficient funds are allocated to the airport to
accomplish normal maintenance and beautification of airport property," the
letter states.

The board is scheduled to consider the letter at its 9:30 a.m. meeting

County officials acknowledge large cuts in the airport budget in recent
years, mainly because of tough economic times that all county departments

"No General Fund money has gone to the airport since 2008," said Doug McCoy,
county administrative services director. "Every department has had cuts and
the airport is no different."

The grand jury letter notes the airport budget has dropped 41 percent since
2008-09 - from $632,135 to $369,256.

However, both McCoy and Airport Manager Mary Hansen said the grand jury
concerns are more aesthetic than safety issues.

"What they are talking about is scheduled to be done, we are just waiting
for the funding," Hansen said.

She said what still needs to be done is not critical.

"The runways are fine and marked well," Hansen said.

"The taxiways should be marked, but it isn't as crucial without commercial

As for weeds and grass, Hansen said, "it's a continual process" to stay
ahead of vegetation growth.

"What we try to do is hit the critical areas where the lights are, but the
priority is residential breaks," she said, referring to homes near airport
property. "Also, you can't just go out and mow it down when the ground is

Hansen noted the Federal Aviation Administration conducts inspections at the
airport and any safety deficiencies that arise are fixed.

Currently, the entire budget for the airport consists of grants - primarily
from the FAA - and revenues from rents and leases.

McCoy said $1 million from an FAA grant and state funds were spent last year
to redo taxiways. It is planned that the new taxiway lines will completed
with another grant next year, he said.

He also said internal steps were taken recently to improve maintenance.

The grand jury letter notes the airport is a "major asset" of the county,
saying the addition of new businesses and the proposed casino near Forty
Mile Road will increase usage.

It asks the Board of Supervisors to respond within 14 days.

Possessory tax allocations

A letter from a Yuba County grand jury committee refers to possessory
interest taxes collected from businesses on airport property, including
those at the nearby industrial park.

Possessory interest is the intent and right of an occupant to exercise
control over a specific plot of land.

All of those possessory interest tax revenues go into the county's General
Fund, the letter notes.

Doug McCoy, director of Yuba County administrative services, acknowledges
that is the case.

The Board of Supervisors could change the allocation of possessory interest
taxes, McCoy said.

"But it would mean taking it from somewhere else," he said.

The letter doesn't specify the amount of possessory interest tax collected
from those airport business. An amount wasn't immediately available on
Monday from county officials.

But the letter notes that "an increase of 10 percent ($36,925) to the
2011-12 airport budget would enable airport personnel to improve the safety
and appearance of the airport."

   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum


Current CAA news channel:

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com