[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Commentary: Airport compatibility and seat belts"
- From: Stephen Irwin <Stephen.Irwin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:27:51 -0700
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Guest Commentary: Airport compatibility and seat belts
By Ken Hetge, Guest Columnist
The Tehachapi (CA) News
Most all auto accidents (95 percent) are caused by driver error.
Nevertheless and regardless of who is at fault, the State of California
requires that you always wear your seat belt. If you choose not to wear your
seat belt, you get stopped by the police, you should expect to pay a $200
fine. Wearing your seat belt is the law because statistics show that you
really don't know when an accident may happen and who may be at fault.
Because of those unknowns, State intervention was needed to protect life and
limb. Seat belts do save lives.
As stated by the city council in the Feb. 19 "Motel Appeal Hearing," "most
airplane accidents are pilot error." The audience heard this statement
bandied back and forth between the Mayor and three other Council members.
This repeated point somehow justified their decision to deny the appeal and
approve the construction of a new motel in Capital Hills.
Ironically, airplanes and cars are very similar. The reason the state
provides specific guidance on wearing your seat belt is exactly the same
reason they provide input on constructing certain buildings and businesses
in specific locations around an airport; you never know when an accident
will happen. Statistically, most car accidents happen within three miles of
The factual data shows that most airplane accidents happen within 4000 feet
of an airport runway. This knowledge is why the state provides very specific
guidelines regarding development in or around airport runway environments.
They also define where the airport "safety zones" are located and why they
are there. Although the city narrowly avoids the FAA-designated "runway
protection zones," they have ignored California's mandate not to build
high-density buildings (motels for one) in incompatible areas. Are most
airplane accidents "pilot error" or does it even matter? An accident is an
accident and the new motel and hospital are approximately 4000 feet from the
runway and beneath the legal and common departure route for the airport.
Fact is fact, yet the City Council discredited and ignored it.
Capital Hills lies in an area that is exposed to airplane traffic. This
location holds a higher statistical risk of seeing an airplane accident than
most other locations in Tehachapi. The state is very clear on what is
required for this area just like a seat belt is required when you drive your
car. If you are not afraid of being thrown through your windshield and
facing a fine for not wearing your seat belt, stop wearing it and be
prepared for the consequences. Otherwise, keep safety in mind and follow the
state guidelines and law. We all know this simple task, in both cases, will
When the Mayor and City Council say statistical facts are nothing more than
"scare tactics," one assumes the state road signs that say, "Click it or
Ticket" are scare tactics, too. Our society strives to protect its citizens
from known harm that is calculated as, "when it will happen" and not, "if it
will happen." Statistically, an airplane accident will happen in Capital
Hills and one only hopes they or their loved ones are not registered at the
motel or confined to a hospital bed when it does. Tell the City of Tehachapi
to follow the state guidelines and that Capital Hills is not the place to
build new motels and hospitals.
Public safety is crucial when evaluating projects of this nature and
unfortunately this community has been asked to fit a square peg in a round
hole. Each of us must tell City Hall to stop the incompatible development
from continuing in Capital Hills and protect those who expect the city to
look out for their well being. Remember, the airport has been here for 75
years but the motel and hospital are new to the neighborhood. Even though a
project is started, it can be changed and made safe and compatible. However,
a bad decision will haunt our community for generations.
KEN HETGE is a commercial pilot and has flown from the Tehachapi Airport
since 1990, has a degree in Aviation Management, and owns an aircraft rental
and maintenance business at Tehachapi Airport.
Airport Land Use: Building near an airport?"
Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org