[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

              

"NY officials could privatize airport without having to repay grants"



Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Warren County could privatize airport without having to repay grants
BY DON LEHMAN
The Glens Falls (NY) Post Star


QUEENSBURY -- Warren County could privatize operations of its airport
without having to repay millions of dollars in grants awarded by the Federal
Aviation Administration, research by the county treasurer has found.

The office of county Treasurer Michael Swan looked into the finances of the
various options the county could take at the Warren County Airport, where
the operating deficit is projected to grow over the next several years.
Swan's office projected the deficit will grow by nearly 20 percent by 2017,
to more than $1 million a year.

Swan said his office undertook the analysis because questions were being
raised about the expense to the county of operating the airport.

One issue brought up as a limitation on the county's options is a possible
repayment requirement on some or all of the $16.2 million in FAA grants the
airport has received since 1992.

Swan said grant repayment would be an issue if the county were to sell the
property for use as something other than an airport. But the county could
turn operations over to a private company, as long as the property was used
for a public airport, without being required to repay the grants.

Swan said his office "looked at ideas floating around" among supervisors,
but no formal proposal to privatize or sell the airport has been made.

The county contracts with Rich Air to serve as "fixed base operator" of
flight operations, but the county also has five employees at the airport to
otherwise operate and maintain it.

County supervisors on the Board of Supervisors Facilities Committee had a
lengthy, wide-ranging discussion Tuesday about the airport, the cost of
running it and its future that was prompted in part by a recent Post-Star
comparison of airport spending in Warren County to spending at other
regional municipal airports.

Glens Falls 3rd Ward Supervisor Bud Taylor and Queensbury at-Large
Supervisor William Mason suggested the county set up a committee to look at
airport operations and a proposed runway extension. The Facilities Committee
did not take action on the request, however.

Queensbury at-Large Supervisor Mark Westcott has proposed slashing the
airport budget by 50 percent. He said Tuesday supervisors will have to make
decisions about whether the deficits from airport operations are worth
maintaining at the same time as deficits from other programs grow in the
coming years.

Glens Falls 1st Ward Supervisor Dan Girard, chairman of the Facilities
Committee that oversees the airport, said he believes the airport's positive
impact on tourism and economic development make it worth operating. He said
having an airport "sets us apart form other communities."

"What we probably have is an airport that is underutilized," Girard said.

In other airport news, airport Manager Ross Dubarry told supervisors Tuesday
that Rich Air plans to charge "transient" airplanes a landing fee of $15 for
single engine planes and $20 for twin-engine aircraft. Planes based at the
airport will not be charged.

The airport historically has not charged landing fees, Dubarry said. The
county will get 3 percent of the revenue that Rich Air brings in through the
fee.

On the web:

http://www.warrencountydpw.com/airport_07/


   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php

*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com