[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Gustine approves airport project"
- From: Stephen Irwin <Stephen.Irwin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:39:22 -0700
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Gustine approves airport project
The Gustine (CA) Press-Standard
GUSTINE - The City Council last week approved a quarter-million dollar
refurbishment of the taxiway areas of the Gustine Municipal Airport, one
piece in an ongoing effort to upgrade airfield operations.
The Airport Commission, council and staff are taking a comprehensive look at
the airfield to identify projects and priorities, said City Manager Greg
Greeson and Assistant City Manager Sean Scully.
The taxiway project was identified as a priority by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), which is funding 90 percent of the cost.
"It is one of the things that FAA had identified that they wanted to see us
improve on," Greeson explained. "As they look at airports, that is one of
the areas that is important to them."
Scully indicated that the city has been saving up annual airport allocations
from the federal agency, accumulating enough money for the project.
The $268,300 cost came in above the engineer's estimate of $249,000, but was
approved by the council.
Greeson said the higher cost was not unexpected because a spike in petroleum
prices has also driven up costs for asphalt and other paving or sealing
products which contain oil.
The city's match will be 10 percent.
The project moves forward as airport commissioners and staff are taking a
comprehensive look at the airport to develop a five-year capital improvement
During a goal-setting workshop, commissioners identified a number of areas
for further investigation, from evaluating the hangars to considering fuel
sales options to developing strategies to attract businesses to the airport.
In the past, there was a waiting list of pilots in line for hangar rentals.
Today, Scully confirmed, there is no waiting list and two hangars stand
Lease rates are reasonable, he said, but the condition of the hangars is
cause for concern.
"Probably the most common criticism we get of the airport is that the
hangars look awful. They are not uniform, we we have reports that some are
in poor repair," Scully commented.
City staff will conduct an inspection of the hangars.
"We are going to go out and do an analysis and review of the hangars,
looking at safety and aesthetics, to see how marketable they are and whether
they should be replaced," Scully explained. "We will bring that back to the
commission to see if we can get a replacement or improvement plan in place,
and just try to work that into the budget."
The condition of the buildings is the top concern expressed by airport
commissioners, he added.
Commissioners also voiced a desire to revisit the current franchise
agreement for fuel sales at the airport to determine if better opportunities
might be available.
"Fuel is one of the ways we create revenue at the airport. It is probably
the most profitable (revenue source) we have, but in recent years it has
kind of flat-lined," noted Scully.
Routine maintenance and economic development opportunities were other topics
of discussion in the goal-setting workshop, Scully told Mattos Newspapers.
He stressed that the city is trying not just to develop a plan which can sit
unused on a shelf, but to identify feasible projects to upgrade the airport
and attract more activity.
"We want recommendations that can be considered for action by the City
Council," Scully emphasized.
As an enterprise fund, the airport is expected to break even financially.
Before the economic downturn the airport was a revenue producer, Greeson
said, and more recently the facility is still "pretty much holding its own."
The airport is an asset which few communities the size of Gustine have,
Greeson and Scully said.
"Across the board, from the council to the commission, everybody has
acknowledged that it is important," they commented. "A lot of cities have
closed their airports. We think it is important that we find ways for this
airport to continue to operate in the black. It has been around a long time,
and we want to keep it."
Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org