[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

              

"Arizona airport to return to municipal control"



Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Airport takeover advances
Payson council now poised to appoint airport commission
By Pete Aleshire
The Payson (AZ) Roundup


The Payson Council tonight will appoint a brand new Airport Commission as it
moves to resume management of the Payson Regional Airport. 

Last week, the council took the first step in the sometimes-controversial
effort to ease the airport's financial problems and lay the groundwork for
its expansion by agreeing to take over operations, despite the objections of
some pilots and other airport users.

At a special meeting tonight at 5:30, the council is scheduled approve
contracts and ordinances to set the takeover in motion, hoping to finish the
transition by February.

The town staff has recommended appointments to the new airport commission,
based on negotiations with the old, private, non-profit Payson Regional
Airport Authority (PRAA). The town turned over the airport to that group
five years ago to save $100,000 in costs and placate unhappy pilots.

If the council accepts the staff recommendation, the new airport commission
members would include Jon Barber, Jim Hunt and Dick Garman, all members of
the PRAA board. Recommendations also include Bill Day, Dan Nyhus, Raymond
Law and Robert Henley, who headed up the airport user study group that
fought to prevent the takeover. 

Some of those airport users raised a final round of objections to the
takeover last week, insisting that the volunteer group that has run the
airport for the past four years has provided excellent service at a cost
much lower than the town did. 

Marie Fasano attempted to rebut suggestions an independent airport authority
couldn't finance improvements and cooperate with the Federal Aviation
Authority, as some have suggested. She noted that larger airports in Sedona,
Kingman, Yuma and Tucson all operate through four years has provided
excellent service at a cost much lower than the town did.

Marie Fasano attempted to rebut suggestions an independent airport authority
couldn't finance improvements and cooperate with the Federal Aviation
Authority, as some have suggested. She noted that larger airports in Sedona,
Kingman, Yuma and Tucson all operate through contracts with private,
nonprofit groups. She said airport users didn't even know the airport board
was negotiating with the town for the past year.

"We didn't know anything was going on," she said. "I feel the concept of the
PRAA was well intentioned. They have worked very hard and very diligently."

Furthermore, she said that 16 people applied for slots on the new
commission, but the process of selecting the board members remained opaque.

However, most of the other speakers at last week's hearing before the
council spoke in favor of the turnover, including several PRAA board
members.

Jon Barber, the current PRAA chairman, said a legal opinion suggesting the
authority had to operate in accordance with the state's open meeting law and
other rules made it difficult to continue - since the board members served
on committees and did a lot of the work of running the airport.

"That was a big hindrance to running the day-to-day operations: Any time you
create a committee you can't talk except in a meeting. Almost all the other
airport authorities are big enough to hire a staff" to manage those daily
tasks.

He said the board had trouble borrowing money to build hangars to generate
additional revenue and faced a financial crisis in 2010 when the town's
$75,000 annually lease for a vehicle maintenance yard on airport property
expired.

The PRAA recently adopted a $10 million expansion plan to accommodate a
projected doubling in landings as Payson grew, which would have included a
terminal, more hangars and a new restaurant.

"We could maybe get by for the next eight years, but when 2019 comes around,
we're broke. When we look at the hard facts, in order for the airport to
grow - PRAA can't do it. The bottom line is that it's in your hands no
matter what," Barber told the council.

PRAA board member and proposed commission member Jim Gardner questioned
putting so many members of the airport authority on the new airport
commission. "If they didn't resolve these problems serving on the airport
authority board, then why put them in the position of advising the town
council?"

Town Attorney Tim Wright said that the recommendation on who the council
should appoint to the airport commission emerged from the negotiations with
the PRAA.

That included a provision in the resolution establishing the airport
commission to exempt members from a town rule barring anyone from serving on
more than one town board or commission at a time.

The provision prompted an inconclusive council debate on whether to grant
that exemption, since one of the proposed commission members already serves
on another town advisory body.

The new ground rules for the airport commission also specify that no more
than two members of the commission can have leases with the airport for
things like hangars or the restaurant. However, any member of the commission
can lease a tie-down or hangar space for an airplane, which includes many of
the pilots in town.

In the end, last week the town council simply listened to comments at the
open public hearing. 

However, tonight the council will take action on a number of issues -
including appointing the members of the airport commission.

   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php

*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com