[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


"Scottsdale council OKs first plan for apartments near airport"

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Scottsdale council OKs first plan for apartments near airport
The Arizona Republic

The Scottsdale City Council this week approved the first of three proposals
to build apartment complexes in the Scottsdale Airpark despite warnings from
Councilman Bob Littlefield and others that it will hurt Scottsdale Airport
and drive business to other Valley airports.
The three proposals are non-major, General Plan amendments to the Greater
Airpark Character Area Plan that call for mixed-use residential buildings.
The change could lead to more than 3,300 residents in the airpark area.
The council voted 6-1 to approve the General Plan amendment, rezoning and
amended development standards for the Residences at Zocallo Place. It calls
for a four-building, 240-unit apartment complex near the northwestern corner
of Greenway-Hayden Loop and 73rd Street, north of the Scottsdale Quarter and
south of the Scottsdale Promenade. The four-story complex could attract an
estimated 543 residents.
Littlefield was the only no vote.
The other two proposals will be considered by the council at its meeting on
Tuesday. One calls for a 605-unit complex south of Hayden Road and west of
Northsight Boulevard, and the other a mixed-use development with 720
apartment units on the CrackerJax site, on Scottsdale Road south of Paradise
Earlier this month, the Scottsdale Airport Advisory Commission rejected all
three proposals, fearing that nearby residents would complain about noise
and push for flight restrictions. The city Planning Commission, however,
recommended the council approve all three proposals.
"Five years from now, when people are down here complaining about the noise,
these (council members), if any of them are left, better hope that the
voters forget that they voted for this," said Littlefield, who is a pilot.
The property that would house the Zocallo complex is owned by Scottsdale
Place LLC. John Berry, a zoning attorney representing the property owner,
said the proposal exceeds all Federal Aviation Administration and city
requirements in the area. "The case is about balancing the needs of the
entire community," he said.
Jim Haxby, a Scottsdale resident and pilot, said he's witnessed the effects
of residential encroachment on other airports, and this complex will prompt
"The end result will be restrictive flight hours," he said.
Apartments in the airpark would prompt noise complaints from residents and
"noise is the No. 1 killer of airports," added Arthur Rosen, a
representative of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.
Airport Advisory Commission Chairman Gunnar Buzzard said adding residential
to the airpark is "not good for the city" and will prompt strict scrutiny by
the FAA.
Gary Mascaro, the airport's aviation director, told the council that
approving the Zocallo proposal wouldn't constitute a violation of any
federal grant assurances.
Numerous residents spoke in favor of the Zocallo proposal. Michael West, who
lives in a multifamily complex at Kierland, west of the airport, said too
much was being made of the noise coming from the airport.
"I have no problem whatsoever," he said.
Lindsey Smith, who owns a salon near the airport, said the complex would
bring welcome customers to her business. She also said the airport is right
behind her business and that noise never has been an issue.
Planning Commission Chairman Michael D'Andrea, speaking as a resident, told
the council that all three sites are "extremely valuable" for residential
use, and that, with proper handling, the proposals don't pose a risk to the
city of losing future FAA funding.
FAA officials could not be reached for comment by press time Wednesday.
Several council members saw benefits to the new apartments.
Councilwoman Suzanne Klapp said adding residential at the airpark will
eliminate some of the traffic congestion on Loop 101, and help support
commercial and retail in the airpark, she said.
Mayor Jim Lane said the city has protected the airport for decades and the
outcry toward this and the other proposals, in a sense, represents
"overzealous protectors."
"I think this is a good project and it brings an awful lot of positive
growth," he said. "It's a great opportunity ... and it's not harmful to a
major asset to the city."

   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum


Current CAA news channel:

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com