[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


"Incompatable Land Use: A tale of two airports"

Saturday, September 17, 2011

A tale of two airports
Nevada airport may hold some answers to tensions between SMO, neighbors
The Santa Monica (CA) Daily Press

SMO - On Monday, Aug. 29, a student pilot in a Cessna 172 crashed into a
home in the Sunset Park neighborhood of Santa Monica for unknown reasons.

The accident raised old concerns about the safety of having airport
operations, including flight schools and private planes, operating so close
to homes.

It's a complaint David Lerner is well-acquainted with.

Lerner doesn't live in Santa Monica. He's actually a resident of Nevada, the
president of the Clark County Aviation Association (CCAA) and sometime
patron of the North Las Vegas Airport, the second busiest airport in the
state with 171,143 takeoffs and landings in the last year.

Like SMO, North Las Vegas Airport has neighbors.

"Well, it filled up as a result of poor planning, but that's something that
usually occurs," Lerner said. "Airports have a nasty habit of being magnets
for that sort of thing."

Developers built homes right up to the outskirts of North Las Vegas, taking
advantage of the lower land values, which resulted in a thriving community
immediately under the flight paths of the seven flight schools and other
general aviation aircraft that operate out of the airport.

"That does breed problems if you have an accident," Lerner said.

And they did. Two fatal accidents out of flight schools within six days of
each other.

Much as in Santa Monica, the community reeled. Activists mobilized.
Legislators got involved. The future of the airport seemed in question.

VGT remains the hub of general aviation in a county-run five-airport system
in Nevada, despite the tragedies. SMO's fate is less certain.

A disclaimer: Although SMO and VGT share some similarities, they also have
fundamental differences.

VGT is much bigger, with three runways and additional safety devices,
largely due to the $80 million in grant money officials accepted from the
Federal Aviation Administration since 1987.

Santa Monica has refused additional grant money from the FAA since 1984, and
does not have emergency systems to catch jets and other planes that go awry.

That and other operational differences make it difficult to compare their
accident rates directly.

However, according to statistics compiled by the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB), 29 planes have gone down in the vicinity of North Las
Vegas since Jan. 1, 2001, resulting in eight deaths.

The same query for Santa Monica shows eight, with seven deaths.

None of the airplane accidents out of Santa Monica resulted in "ground"
injuries, meaning that no bystanders were hurt by the falling planes, said
Chris Dancy, spokesperson for the Airline Owners and Pilots Association, or

"In a given year, the number of ground injuries can be counted on one,
sometimes two hands," Dancy said. "The danger to people on the ground is
very small."

The accidents listed do not fully describe the situation, according to
statistics compiled by Zina Josephs, chairperson of the Friends of Sunset
Park neighborhood group.

According to her totals, there have been 83 accidents and 40 fatalities
resulting from airplanes at SMO, flying to SMO or operated out of SMO, as
well as two in the Santa Monica airspace since 1982.

Those accident reports were gleaned not just from the NTSB database, but
also from airport-related websites, including those run by locals -
jetairpollution.com, casmat.org and badair.org - and national organizations
like AOPA.

The additional sourcing fills in gaps left by NTSB searches, which only
count flights that went down in Santa Monica city limits.

For instance, that search would not include a fatal wreck one year ago which
went down at Penmar Golf Course, less than a quarter mile from the site of
the August accident.

National statistics tend to throw local observations into sharp relief.

General aviation, which is the category of flights that both SMO and VGT
supports, has seen a substantial decline in activity over the past decade,
according to NTSB stats in a report entitled "Annual Review of U.S. Civil
Aviation Accidents, 2007-2009."

"The overall accident rate has remained relatively flat, at about six
accidents per 100,000 flight hours, and the fatal rate has stayed at about
one fatal accident per 100,000 flight hours," the report reads.

In 2009, general aviation pilots logged just under 24 million flight hours,
which equates to roughly 240 deaths, on average.

Compare that to the tens of thousands of fatal accidents that occur on
America's highways and byways - 30,797 resulting in 33,808 deaths in 2009 -
and general aviation flying seems like traveling in bubble wrap.

That's faint consolation to those that live in the surrounding
neighborhoods, who, by dint of flyovers, pollution and noise - the three
most common complaints about the airport - feel as though the sword of
Damocles were hanging over their heads.

Martin Rubin, a Los Angeles resident and anti-airport activist, has felt
that fear.

He saw a jet coming in low and gun its engines while it was still in a
seemingly-awkward position, realizing it wouldn't make its approach to the

The plane righted itself and made the landing on a second pass, but it left
Rubin flustered.

"It really shook me up," Rubin said.

Relations between SMO and its neighborhood are sour. City Hall is currently
engaged in a "visioning process" looking at possible uses for the airport
if, as city officials hope, the FAA loses its control over the uses of the
airport when its 1984 agreement expires in four years.

The FAA, for its part, maintains that is not the case.

In an attempt to impress the positives of the airport upon residents, a
group called Friends of the Santa Monica Airport has engaged in a public
relations campaign.

Its most recent attempt, called Day at the Airport, would have put old
aircraft on display and taught visitors about different aviation
occupations, had it not been canceled three days prior out of fears that too
many people would attend.

Back in Nevada, it was exactly things like Day at the Airport that helped
ease tensions between VGT and the surrounding community, Lerner said.

CCAA puts on annual open houses, inviting people into the airport to teach
about airport operations.

"It's a dynamic process, not something that's static," Lerner said. "We keep
after it. You can't just stop doing this. If you do, people have a tendency
to forget."


Building near an airport?

   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum


Current CAA news channel:

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com