[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Palo Alto City Council votes to take back airport ops"
- From: Stephen Irwin <stepheni@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:40:09 -0800
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Council votes to take back airport ops
City estimates negotiations with county will take 3 years
By Kristina Peterson
The Palo Alto (CA) Daily News
The Palo Alto City Council voted 5-3 Tuesday night to begin negotiating
with Santa Clara County to take back operations of the city-owned
airport, following a long and tense debate.
City staff will immediately begin what they estimate will be a
three-year process to terminate early the county's airport lease,
presently slated to expire in 2017. Council members Bern Beecham,
LaDoris Cordell and Mayor Yoriko Kishimoto opposed the move. Council
Member Dena Mossar was absent.
The council members split into two camps - several felt the city did not
have enough information to ascertain whether the airport could be
economically viable, while the other faction argued the county's
reluctance to spend any extra money to improve the facility beyond the
bare minimum meant the city was neglecting an asset it still owns.
"We would not be good custodians of our community's property if we let
it sit there for 10 years," said Vice Mayor Larry Klein, one of the
strongest supporters of having a city-run airport.
Since the county Board of Supervisors has already voted to fund only
"essential, non-deferrable, grant-eligible maintenance projects or
security-related projects," the city could recover its property in 2017
in worse shape, Council Member Jack Morton said.
"The city runs the risk of getting a deteriorated facility in 2017,"
agreed Ralph Britton, co-chairman of the Palo Alto Airport Working
Group, a citizen task force which recommended this summer that the city
immediately move to take back operations from the county.
But several council members asked why the county has so far expressed a
willingness to hand the airport back to Palo Alto.
"The county is in the business of operating airports," Council Member
John Barton said. "They have others; they want out of this one. There
might be a reason."
In recent years, the county has argued that the airport is a
money-loser, though City Auditor Sharon Erickson has challenged the
accounting methods used by the county.
Beecham said the issue just needed more analysis from a financial
"I simply don't know if we can do it economically," he said. "We have no
business plan for this."
Council Member Judy Kleinberg countered that the city has gained its
expertise in other fields by hiring experienced staff members or
entering into public-private partnerships.
"At the moment we are on the sidelines," she said. "I think we need to
come in and start playing the game at this point."
A substitute motion by Kishimoto to defer the start of negotiations
until 2010, when the Army Corps of Engineers is slated to finish a study
of levees in the area, failed 2-6. Other council members pushed to
launch the lengthy process earlier.
"If we don't start now, we've handicapped our ability to make decisions
in the future," Morton said.
City Manager Frank Benest said staff will return with a timeline of the
negotiations, including a breakdown of the resources and staff time
Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com