"Officials bitter over Sikorsky decision"

["Stephen Irwin" <stepheni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Officials bitter over Sikorsky decision
BY GENEVIEVE REILLY and RICHARD WEIZEL
The Connecticut Post


STRATFORD - Lordship Boulevard resident Walter Rimkunas isn't ready to hop
on board a plan to expand Sikorsky Memorial Airport.

And neither is Mayor James R. Miron.

"I am very irate," Rimkunas said Wednesday after learning that the state
Department of Transportation has approved plans that would allow the airport
- located in Stratford but owned by Bridgeport - to create a "safety zone"
at the end of the main runway, the site of a 1994 crash that killed eight
people.

"I live right at the end of the runway," Rimkunas said. "It took me by
surprise. I've been fighting this airport for 55 years."

The project would include relocating Main Street east, toward the Housatonic
River, to accommodate the area needed for the safety zone.

Miron said he's upset with the DOT, which made its decision without input
from the town.

"It is very disappointing to me that the DOT would make this decision
without giving Stratford residents and myself the chance to express our
views at a public hearing," he said Wednesday. "It's also disingenuous for
the DOT to say we're not interested after contacting my office once to try
and arrange a meeting that I had a conflict with," Miron said. "We asked for
another date, and they never got back to us."

Miron was also critical of Bridgeport Mayor John M. Fabrizi.

"He seems to be playing all the angles on this," Miron said. "We met
recently about the future of the airport, and I came away believing
Stratford would be part of any changes made there."

"The bottom line is that Stratford must be allowed to have a say in what
happens at the airport. That doesn't mean I'm opposed to safety changes, I
just want to have a say."

Miron also said the town is still interested in purchasing the airport from
Bridgeport, and denied the town has no other motive than to shut down the
facilities.

State Sen. Dan Debicella, R-Shelton, who also represents Stratford, said
Wednesday he's not happy with the process that led to the DOT approval of
the safety zone, which he called preliminary.

"The DOT did not consult with the town, they did not talk with any of us,"
he said.

He said Stratford's legislative delegation will meet with the DOT on the
issue this week.

"We have letters from prior DOT commissioners that the state would make
changes only if Stratford first approved them," Debicella said. "If GE owned
the airport, they'd have to get local zoning approval."

He said the project has two issues: the Main Street relocation and the
airport expansion.

"I'm 100 percent opposed to any expansion of the footprint of the airport,"
Debicella said. "We don't want large commercial flights."

Expanding the airport's footprint would require federal approval, he said.

But Fabrizi insists the work on the safety zones would not "add one inch" to
the runway, and that every attempt has been made to keep Stratford involved.

"I've been trying to talk to Stratford officials for a number of years,"
Fabrizi said Wednesday. He said the work to improve the airport would cut
down on the liability for Bridgeport's taxpayers.

As for talk that Stratford should consider buying the airport,Fabrizi said,
"I will not close the door on that."

Fabrizi said the best owner for the airport would be the state.

"They have the economic development to make this a viable entity and a
regional asset for the airline industry."

   Post your opinion on this story in the CAA General Aviation Forum
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php

*****************************************