[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Opinion: GOP House Bill Would Give Control Of Air Traffic ToAirlines and Aviation Lobbying Groups"
Thursday, June 22, 2017
GOP House Bill Would Give Control Of Air Traffic To Airlines and Aviation
By John Goglia
The House Transportation Committee Chairman, Bill Shuster, today unveiled his
bill to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration, make other aviation
changes and, significantly, privatize U.S. air traffic control. The bill would
create a federally chartered, not-for-profit corporation called the American
Air Navigation Services Corporation. The purpose, according to the proposed
legislation, is to "provide for the more efficient operation and improvement of
air traffic services." Although federally-chartered, the corporation would not
be a part of the United States government. It would be subject to
"performance-based regulations and minimum safety standards" but otherwise
responsible for establishing and managing US air traffic services.
The bill would take air traffic out of the hands of the federal government and
put it in a private company run by a CEO and 12 directors. Two directors would
be appointed by the Secretary of Transportation. The airlines would nominate 3
directors. Lobbying groups for - the bill refers to them euphemistically as
"the principal organizations representing" - general aviation, business
aviation owners and operators, aviation-related entities (such as fixed-base
operators), general aviation manufacturers, major airports and airport
executives would nominate a total of 3 directors. One director each would be
nominated by unions representing air traffic controllers and airline pilots.
Two additional directors would be nominated and selected by the other directors.
While the bill provides conflict of interest and fiduciary requirements, I do
not believe they are sufficient to overcome the nominating process which puts
far too much control of our nation's skies in a very small group of interested
parties - the airlines and aviation lobbying groups. Notably absent from the
Board is any requirement for passenger or consumer representation. Nor is
there any provision for unmanned aircraft to hold a seat.
In my opinion, the FAA could certainly improve on the speed with which it is
modernizing the nation's air traffic control system. But it's done a
commendable job keeping the skies safe and balancing the needs of the myriad
users of the system which now includes a growing presence of unmanned aircraft.
Changing control of the nation's skies should not be undertaken lightly and
certainly should not be put in the hands of private parties with inherent
conflicts of interest in use of the airspace.
Fortunately, the Senate's proposed FAA reauthorization bill does not include
any provision for privatizing air traffic control. Let's hope the House
provisions don't make it out of the transportation committee.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com