[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Airports urge Trump to ditch cap on passenger fees"


 
Friday, June 2, 2017

Airports urge Trump to ditch cap on passenger fees 
By Melanie Zanona 
The Hill


U.S. airports are urging President Trump to remove a federal cap on how much 
they can charge passengers for facility upgrades, painting it as a way to raise 
money for infrastructure improvements while also making airports more 
self-sufficient.

In a joint letter to the White House this week, two major airport groups asked 
Trump to lift the $4.50 limit on the fee that is added to every plane ticket, 
known as the passenger facility charge (PFC). 

The letter is signed by the American Association of Airport Executives and 
Airports Council International - North America, which called the federal cap 
"outdated" and "unnecessary."

Airports generally want to see the PFC raised to $8.50 per ticket. The fee, 
which helps pay for major airport projects, hasn't been raised in over 15 
years. 

"The arbitrary federal cap on local PFCs handcuffs airports and unfairly 
restricts their ability to use local revenue to build capital projects," the 
groups wrote to Trump. 

They also argued that ditching the cap would make airports less reliant on the 
federal government and would encourage more private-sector investment - two 
core principles identified in Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure proposal.

Trump, who has long lamented the country's "third-world" airports, outlined a 
broad sketch of his promised rebuilding plan in his budget proposal last week. 

The package would spend $200 billion in taxpayer money over 10 years to create 
$1 trillion worth of overall investment through public-private partnerships.

Some of the key principles underlining Trump's infrastructure proposal include 
encouraging more "self-help" among local governments and transportation systems 
and leveraging more capital from the private sector.

Airports called ditching the PFC cap "directly consistent" with Trump's 
rebuilding vision.

"It is clear that doing away with this outdated and unnecessary federal 
restriction would allow airports to become more financially independent from 
the federal government and help them leverage private sector funding for 
significant capital projects," the groups wrote.

There is some bipartisan support in Congress for lifting the PFC cap. One bill 
would do so in exchange for trimming money from federal Airport Improvement 
Program.

However, Congress opted not to address the PFC cap in last year's long-term 
proposal to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA.)

The idea of raising passenger fees for airport projects has faced strong 
pushback from the airline industry, which argues that passengers are already 
charged enough fees by the government when they purchase airline tickets.

Lawmakers will have an opportunity to address the issue when they debate 
another FAA reauthorization this summer. Support from the White House for 
eliminating the PFC cap could prod Congress into action, but Trump did not 
propose the concept in his budget blueprint. 

The president instead called for separating air traffic control from the 
federal government as a way to help speed up modernization efforts.
 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com