[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Transparency is essential to make aviation climate deal work"
Thursday, May 25, 2017
Transparency is essential to make aviation climate deal work
As countries write the rules for airlines to offset their emissions growth,
they must make sure there is no double-counting
By Connie Hedegaard
Last October, many rejoiced when 190 governments reached agreement on a climate
deal for international aviation, but it's not time to sit back and relax.
Many details still need to be worked out, with transparency being one of the
most important, to ensure the agreement truly helps the environment.
Countries are meeting soon to discuss the rules that will govern the agreement.
These meetings are highly technical but also highly consequential. If the
outcome is hiding the aviation agreement's results from the world, we will have
no way to know we are flying on course to a sustainable planet.
Without transparency, there is a risk that emission reductions credited to the
aviation sector could be double-counted in the Paris Agreement, weakening
overall climate ambition.
The aviation deal, which was struck at the United Nations International Civil
Aviation Organisation (ICAO), aims to stabilise emissions from this sector at
2020 levels by requiring airlines to purchase reductions elsewhere in order to
compensate for their growing emissions.
It is a tentative first step, and needs to be much more ambitious to make sure
that aviation plays its role in addressing climate change. But it's an
important development, and one which would not have occurred without years of
persistent European leadership and engagement.
Establishing effective carbon markets is no easy feat, especially one where
airlines purchase emission reductions from other sectors. To put it simply -
how can you be sure these reductions are not also being counted toward other
climate targets? Moreover, some "offset credits" have been shown not to
represent real emission reductions. How can you be sure that the credits
airlines buy meet minimum quality standards?
Transparency must be the overriding principle to address these concerns.
Consumers who fly, and therefore pay for these offsets, need to know whether
their airline is complying with international rules; whether the emission
reductions promised are actually delivered; and whether those same emission
reductions have been pledged to anyone else.
This level of transparency can be achieved if each airline is required to
disclose its total emissions each year, and document that it is meeting its
goals under the agreement. All programs that supply emission reductions to the
airlines must provide assurances that these reductions aren't being claimed by
Europe has plenty of experience with these systems. Much of my time as Europe's
climate commissioner was spent trying to make Europe's carbon market work
better. Europe was the largest purchaser of offsets and we learned from
experience that strict rules are needed to make sure every emitter reports its
emissions, and to prevent, detect, and punish fraud, including keeping out
offsets from environmentally harmful projects and those that in fact delivered
no emission reductions. It is impossible to see this aviation agreement work
effectively without similar levels of transparency.
Aviation officials implementing the new agreement don't have to start from
scratch. They can learn from Europe's experience that transparency is integral
to success, including an open decision making process, opportunity for public
comment, and clarity that rules are being followed and enforced. The
International Coalition for Sustainable Aviation, an NGO network working on
this issue, has prepared best practices for transparency that offers a roadmap
for an effective aviation carbon market.
Europe is not the only carbon market that relies on transparency for success.
Global and state efforts like the Kyoto Protocol and California Cap and Trade
are other examples of where transparency has played a central role in
establishing and improving carbon markets. With so many markets operating with
transparency, there is no excuse for the international aviation community not
to do the same.
Connie Hedegaard is a former European Commissioner for Climate Action and
currently serves as Chairwoman of the KR Foundation
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org