[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Major U.S. Airports Say Current Rules Prevent Incidents Like United"


 
Friday, April 28, 2017

Major U.S. Airports Say Current Rules Prevent Incidents Like United 
By Chris Kenning


CHICAGO (Reuters) - At least 10 major U.S. airports say their rules prevent 
security officers from physically removing passengers from airplanes unless a 
crime is committed, meaning they would normally avoid incidents such as the one 
involving the passenger dragged off a United Airlines  flight in Chicago. 

The April 9 incident sparked global outrage when images of a 
Vietnamese-American doctor being dragged through the aisle with blood on his 
face flooded social media and threw United into a public relations crisis.

Officials at 10 of the busiest U.S. airports - in Atlanta, Los Angeles, Dallas, 
New York, Denver, San Francisco, Las Vegas and Miami - said airport police 
would not physically remove a passenger from a plane over a seat dispute.

"In a case like this, if it's not a criminal matter, we don't involve 
ourselves," said Michael Rodriguez, a spokesman with the Las Vegas Metro Police 
Department, which is responsible for security at McCarran International Airport.

The passenger, David Dao, flying home to Louisville, refused to surrender his 
seat to make room for United crew members and was forcibly removed by aviation 
police at O'Hare International Airport.

His attorney said he ended up with a concussion, missing teeth and broken nose. 
United Airlines initially blamed Dao but later apologized for its handling of 
the incident. [nL1N1HL0UK]

United Chief Executive Oscar Munoz said the company would no longer use law 
enforcement officers to remove passengers from overbooked flights. 
[nL1N1HK0DL][nL1N1HN012]

United on Thursday said after reviewing the incident that using law enforcement 
when there was no safety or security issue was a failure and called the 
incident a "defining moment." [nL1N1HY2A0]

Security officials at other major airports said they had reviewed their rules 
and found them sufficient, with no need to amend them to avoid similar 
situations. Others said they had sent reminders to officers to avoid getting 
involved in such cases.

New York's Port Authority Police, which patrol LaGuardia, JFK International and 
Newark Liberty International airports, reminded officers that in cases of 
overbooking they "will not assist in the physical removal of the passenger from 
the flight to accommodate the airline's request," said Joe Pentangelo, Port 
Authority police spokesman.

Atlanta airport officers also would not have boarded the plane as O'Hare's 
police did, said Lane Hagan, airport precinct commander with the Atlanta Police 
Department, which oversees security at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 
International, America's busiest airport.

The view was echoed by all airports contacted by Reuters, although most would 
not comment on the United incident.

"It couldn't just be, 'Oh, we have an overbooked flight,'" said Doug Yakel, 
spokesman at San Francisco International Airport.

Chicago Department of Aviation officials have said the incident is under 
investigation and declined to comment. They have not discussed the incident in 
detail, citing pending litigation.

According to a report released on Monday by the city, which is in charge of 
airport security, the three officers involved said Dao became combative after 
they unsuccessfully tried to persuade him to leave.

However, at a Chicago City Council committee meeting this month, Deputy 
Commissioner of Security Jeff Redding said department policy calls for its 
officers not to board planes to handle customer service issues.

Ordering a passenger who is not causing trouble to leave the plane so another 
person can take their seat would not constitute a lawful order, said John 
Banzhaf, a law professor at George Washington University who has followed the 
United case closely.

A carrier's need for seats is not among more than a dozen reasons that allows 
the airline to remove an already-seated passenger, he said.

"Law enforcement should not become involved unless it appears there is a danger 
to the safety or health of passengers, crew or the airplane," Banzhaf said.
 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com