[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Airport rule may require federal permitting of private constructionbeyond perimeter fence"
Friday, February 3, 2017
Airport rule may require federal permitting of private construction in Kenai
By BEN BOETTGER
The Kenai (AK) Peninsula Clarion
A Federal Aviation Administration rule for construction on airports may apply
to Kenai businesses beyond the physical bounds of the Kenai Municipal Airport
An FAA rule that went into effect in August 2016 will require construction on
airport land to follow the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act, under which
federally-funded or permitted projects must be examined through a rigorous
federal procedure for their effects on the environment. In Kenai, the airport's
wide-ranging land ownership may require this process of businesses that don't
get federal funds or federal permitting.
In his report to the Kenai city council on Wednesday, Kenai City Manager Paul
Ostrander said he had learned of the new rule in a meeting with FAA
representatives last week in Anchorage, which he attended with Kenai Airport
Manager Mary Bondurant, Finance Director Terry Eubank, and Public Works
Director Sean Wedemeyer.
Ostrander told council members that applying NEPA requirements to all
construction on airport land would be "a huge shift from what we've seen in the
"We'll continue to follow that and see how impactful it really is to the city,"
Wince-Corthell-Bryson, the Kenai-based engineering firm which holds a contract
for engineering on the Kenai airport, already goes through the NEPA process for
its work because of the federal funding it receives from the FAA. In 2016, this
work included a roughly $2 million taxiway renovation - of which $1.9 million
was FAA-funded - and replacement of a floatplane pond drainage for $379,643, of
which the FAA contributed $355,915.
With the NEPA requirement extended to all construction on Kenai airport land,
other business connected to the airport only by the ownership of the land
beneath them may be required to go through the same procedure. As of 2015, the
Kenai airport legally owned 94 pieces of property throughout the city that had
been leased and developed by private business-owners into businesses such as a
bowling alley, a car wash, and various stores. This arrangement is the legacy
of the military airfield which covered much of present-day Kenai in the 1940s
and 50s, and which the FAA granted to Kenai's municipal government after it was
decommissioned. Kenai has since sold or leased much of that land to individuals
and businesses that have developed it.
Exactly how the NEPA requirement would be applied to these businesses isn't
completely clear. FAA spokesperson Allen Kenitzer wrote in an email that "NEPA
does not automatically apply to every development."
"We must review them on a case-by-case basis," Kenitzer wrote.
Ostrander wrote in an email that the FAA had not yet given specifics of the new
policy and that Kenai administrators "are still going to be working with FAA to
better understand the regulations and what impacts they may have on the City."
In an interview following the Wednesday council session, Ostrander gave
examples of the new rule that he said FAA staff had given during his meeting
"If you put up a sign on your building, that wouldn't require a NEPA,"
Ostrander said. "If you expand your building, expand your parking lot, those
would fall in the category of needing to go through the NEPA process. Which is
why when they initially told it to us, our reaction was, 'Wow, that's
According to Ostrander and Kenitzer, the rule was previously in effect in every
state but Alaska.
On the web: http://www.ci.kenai.ak.us/airport
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at email@example.com