[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Privatization talks continue to taxi at Milwaukee airport"


 

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Privatization talks continue to taxi at airport

By Doug Hissom

OnMilwaukee.com

 

http://www.onmilwaukee.com/images/articles/po/politics062008/politics062008_story1.jpg

 

http://www.onmilwaukee.com/images/layout/buttons/cutline_inside.gif

Some local legislators are tiring of talk of privatizing Mitchell International.

 

The idea to privatize Milwaukee's Mitchell International Airport refuses to be grounded. The airport actually makes money for the county and isn't in major disrepair or in need of an overhaul, yet some local officials continue to carry the torch for selling it off.

Tiring of such talk is state Sen. Tim Carpenter (D-Milwaukee), who is doing his best to shoot down the plans. After recent reports that privatization backers are still running amok, Carpenter points to Detroit's failed attempt at letting a small cadre of business interests run their airport. Detroit transferred control of two airports in 2002.

"Detroit's new agency now has 46 executives making more than $100,000 per year, and 53 executives who got perks of vehicles or vehicle allowances," notes Carpenter. That's "double the amount from when the Detroit airport was run publicly."

He goes on to say that before privatization, the travel budget for Detroit airport executives was less than $100,000, but last year the new authority spent over $850,000 on travel for executives.

Carpenter says a survey that got 2,100 responses from his district found only 6 percent in favor of a transfer of the airport to control by a non-elected agency.

"Any discussion of changing the structure or finances of Mitchell Airport will have to fly against many questions," he says.

Milwaukee County Board Chair Lee Holloway has flown into the debate as well, albeit in a less headstrong way than Carpenter.

"The proof will be in the details," says Holloway. "The airport uses no property tax dollars in its operation and all revenues generated from passengers and airlines are used to maintain and improve the airport. A private operator, however, would keep profits and could put additional cost burdens on both passengers and airlines. I am also concerned about a plan that does not provide safeguards for property tax payers in the event that privatization would fail."

 

JPEG image

GIF image


Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com