Federal officials don't see any
facility having too much security. “We need to lengthen our memory,” Melendez
said. “We know terrorists on September 11 originated from a small airport in
Maine. “The notion that one airport is less vulnerable than another is the
wrong way to look at it.”
By Malia Spencer
The Santa Maria (CA)
Times
TSA employees check passengers bags at
the Santa Maria Airport.
Enhancements to security
at the Santa Maria Public Airport are being welcomed by federal regulators but
questioned by some airport tenants as overkill.
At issue are efforts to
beef up security on the airfield by installing a security-management system and
more closed-circuit television cameras.
Airport officials say the enhancements are needed to keep up with
federal regulations, and therefore ensure federal funding, but some
general-aviation pilots see the added security as an unnecessary
hassle.
Airport officials began negotiations last week with Newton
Construction Management, the San Luis Obispo-based company that the board of
directors has selected for the project.
The board went against staff
recommendation when it unanimously chose the firm - which will use Santa
Maria-based Quintron Systems for the security component of the project - on a
5-0 vote.
Staff had recommend the contract go to Navigance Technologies,
a Los Angeles-based company that had planned to use a Massachusetts firm for
security.
Staff recommendation was based on Navigance's previous airport
experience and the fact that its proposal - at $860,550 - was cheaper, said Ric
Tokoph, airport operations supervisor.
However, the board opted to go
with the local contractor with the stipulation that staff negotiate with Newton
to see where their approximately $1 million proposal could be streamlined, said
Carl Engel board president.
Both Engel and Newton president Eric Newton
said they thought an agreeable contract price, for a top quality system, could
be reached.
The system, which would control access to the airport, is
expected to include an access card to regulate the roughly 20 motorized gates
around the airfield perimeter. Access cards would be given to airport tenants,
Tokoph explained.
Terminal employees, who require a higher security
clearance, would be given cards after a background check is
completed.
More than 20 closed circuit TV cameras are proposed to be
installed, Tokoph said.
He declined to go into detail about the TV
monitoring, but noted there already are cameras in the terminal.
The
whole project “is an upgrade to current security standards from (the
Transportation Security Agency),” he said.
The project is 95 percent
funded by the Federal Aviation Administration, and airport officials are working
against an Aug. 30 funding deadline. The enhanced security covers the roughly
1,500 acres within the airport operation area.
Officials with Central
Coast Jet Center and Arctic Air, two large tenants on the airfield, both said
the increased security measures are a good idea and would actually help their
businesses and not hinder them.
In the past TSA officials have been
critical of Santa Maria Public Airport security, which has seen breaches,
including a November 2004 incident in which a Nipomo man accessed the airfield
and tampered with a private cargo jet.
Federal officials are pleased the
airport is spending resources on security upgrades.
“It's been six years
since September 11, and over the course of time, we've seen large and small
airports use the resources they can to enhance security,” said TSA spokesman
Nico Melendez.
However, some airport users who have hangers within the
secured area are not as enthusiastic about the proposed changes.
“I don't
think we need all the security we are getting,” said general aviation pilot Pat
Viker. “...It's one thing if we had some really heavy traffic - but we
don't.”
Mark Pirman, a pilot and hanger tenant at the airport for more
than 20 years, agreed, adding that airports in the Los Angeles basin may need
this type of security but they have the commercial flights to back it
up.
Pirman also fears that the airport may remove access points as a way
to reduce the cost of the program, which would hamper airport use.
Even
with enhanced security since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, Pirman and his
wife Diane, who is also a pilot, don't see Santa Maria as a risky
airport.
“What it comes down to, if you are a terrorist, are you going to
hit the Santa Maria Airport,” Diane Pirman asked.
Federal officials,
however, don't see any facility having too much security.
“We need to
lengthen our memory,” Melendez said.
“We know terrorists on September 11
originated from a small airport in Maine.
“The notion that one airport is
less vulnerable than another is the wrong way to look at
it.”
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com