[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"FAA study says Bay Area airports must expand to meet demand"
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
A place to land
FAA study says Bay Area airports must expand to meet demand
By Marisa Lagos
The San Francisco (CA) Chronicle
Bay Area airports will need to expand their capacity by 2015 and work
together to find regional solutions to air traffic congestion problems or
face gridlock and serious delays, according to a report released by the
Federal Aviation Administration on Tuesday.
The Bay Area is one of eight metropolitan areas that need to increase the
number of flights it can handle by 2025, the report states, a task it says
could be difficult because the region is hampered by "geographic, terrain
and airspace issues" that limit its ability to add additional runway
capacity.
Because of that, the report says, the region's airports should explore using
existing smaller airports in the region to help take the burden off of San
Francisco and Oakland, an option already being considered, local airport
officials said. The report also suggests using new technology to increase
runway capacity, a measure that is already being considered at San Francisco
International Airport.
The report, "Capacity Needs in the National Airspace System," is the FAA's
second since 2004. It looks at the 291 commercial service airports and 223
metropolitan areas across the country to determine their needs in the next
eight years.
The agency chose 56 airports for a more detailed analysis and worked with
airport officials to determine what needs to be done.
In all, the report found that 14 airports and eight metropolitan areas will
require additional capacity by 2015.
Oakland International Airport will need to add capacity in the next eight
years, the report found, even with planned improvements such as the $300
million, nearly completed expansion project that will add five gates and
allow 18 million passengers to pass through the airport annually by 2010, up
from 14.4 million in 2006.
Spokeswoman Rosemary Barnes said Oakland Airport, which has nearly tripled
its passenger load since 1991, plans to add a terminal with between 10 and
20 gates, but will not add any runways.
"The FAA is showing that by 2015 ... we will see delays on the airfield,"
she said. "So instead of Oakland focusing on building a new runway --
because of environmental issues and costs, it's not that easy any more -- we
are working from a regional standpoint ... to look at where airfield
capacity can be added."
SFO spokesman Mike McCarron said officials are hoping to work with smaller
airports, such as Concord, to increase the number flights to them. He said
the Regional Airport Planning Committee -- made up of officials from SFO,
Oakland, Mineta San Jose International Airport and other regional
transportation bodies -- is already working on this option.
According to the FAA, San Jose does not have an immediate need to add
capacity. The airport is in the process of expanding and improving terminals
and runways.
Capacity problems result in delays throughout the air travel system, the
report states. As the industry bounced back from a post-Sept. 11 slump,
on-time arrivals at the nation's busiest airports have dropped from an
average of 82 percent in 2002 to 75 percent in 2006.
SFO's on-time rate was 70.3 percent in 2006, according to the Department of
Transportation, compared with 76.9 percent in 2004. Oakland slipped from
81.2 percent in 2004 to 78.3 percent in 2006.
In the next 10 years, the report said, the Bay Area will "serve as an ...
example of a capacity-constrained metropolitan area where runway
construction may not be an option. In these cases, demand management,
regulatory or economic solutions and other market mechanisms need to be
investigated."
Those options include relaxing some of the FAA's rules and utilizing
improved navigation technology and landing capabilities as well as improved
weather and traffic information, which could allow more planes to land at
airports at one time.
McCarron said SFO is already considering some of these improvements. The
airport's operations are often hampered by low clouds, which cut landing
capacity in half, and it has installed a system that allows more planes to
safely land when the cloud ceiling is as low as 2,100 feet.
On Tuesday, the airports commission voted to ask the FAA to lower that
ceiling to 1,600 feet, he said.
But SFO is operating under capacity and has not yet reached the traffic
levels it hit in 2000, when more than 40 million passengers used the
airport, compared with an estimated 33 million this year.
And one terminal at the airport is vacant while it is being remodeled, he
said.
"Our short-term challenge is to get 14 to 15 new domestic gates (in that
terminal) open by 2016," he said. "Our runway capacity is OK right now."
The airport is also considering charging airlines more to land during busy
times as a way to space flights more evenly throughout the day.
More flights, people
Projected annual passenger and airline operations
San Francisco International Airport
2007 -- 33 million passengers, 307,000 departures and landings
2008 -- 38.4 million passengers, 350,000 departures and landings
2011 -- 42 million passengers, 400,000 departures and landings
2016 -- 48 million passengers, 450,000 departures and landings
Oakland International Airport
2006 -- 14.4 million passengers, 160,600 departures and landings
2010 -- 18 million passengers, 197,830 departures and landings
2025 -- 30 million passengers, unknown number of departures and landings
Source: Oakland and San Francisco airport projections
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com