[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Judge Permits Homeowners' Noise Case Against Minneapolis to Proceed"


 
Friday, March 30, 2007

Judge Permits Homeowners' Noise Case Against Minneapolis to Proceed 
By Rochelle Olson 
The Minneapolis (MN) Star Tribune 


Thousands of homeowners will get their day in court over airport noise in a
lawsuit filed against the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) because
Hennepin County District Judge Stephen Aldrich decided Wednesday to allow
the case to go forward.

"The homeowners are thrilled," lawyer Carolyn Anderson said. "We won
everything."

MAC spokesman Patrick Hogan said the commission was disappointed by the
decision. "We believe our actions to mitigate noise around Minneapolis-St.
Paul International Airport are consistent with our obligations to the
communities and residents of Minnesota," he said in a statement.

The homeowners living near the airport brought the class-action suit
accusing the MAC of breaking a promise to insulate their homes. They claim
the promise was part of an agreement to expand the airport rather than build
a new one farther out.

A May 7 trial date was set. The case is on a parallel track with a suit
filed on behalf of the cities of Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan.

The homeowners in the class-action suit contend there was both an expressed
and implied contract with the MAC. The estimated cost of the insulation is
$37,100 per home and includes repair and replacement of exterior windows,
the addition of storm windows, repair or replacement of doors, addition of
storm doors, attic insulation and central air conditioning.

In depositions, the mayors of Minneapolis, Eagan and Richfield said they
supported the airport expansion in exchange for an expansion of the noise
mitigation program. Aldrich will ultimately decide how many homes and which
homes are included, Anderson said.

In the other suit, Aldrich already has ruled the MAC broke a commitment to
provide soundproofing to thousands of homes in violation of its own
noise-abatement standards.

Final arguments in that case were heard last week. Aldrich gave no
indication when he would rule on the matter but told the parties he would
prefer they settled it themselves.

 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com