[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"U.S. Appeals Court Says Unions Can't Strike a Bankrupt Airline"


 
Friday, March 30, 2007

Appeals Court Says Unions Can't Strike a Bankrupt Airline 
BY JOSHUA FREED 
The Associated Press 


A federal appeals court left a strike ban in place for flight attendants at
Northwest Airlines on Thursday, clearing up a murky area of labor law in a
way that unions won't like.

The ruling means flight attendants could still strike, eventually, if they
first exhaust the lengthy requirements of airline labor law. But federal
mediators have refused to declare the talks at an impasse, a critical step
in that process.

The ruling focused on when employees at a bankrupt company can strike.

Northwest won concessions from its other unions as it reorganized under
bankruptcy protection over the past year. Two successive flight attendant
unions negotiated concessions only to have them rejected by the
rank-and-file. In response, Northwest - with a bankruptcy judge's permission
- imposed pay cuts and work rule changes July 31.

Flight attendants claimed a right to strike because, they said, Northwest's
action amounted to the kind of unilateral change prohibited by the Railway
Labor Act, which governs airlines and railroads.

Northwest had argued that a strike could put it out of business. And a
federal judge blocked union plans for random, unannounced walkouts.

That injunction was upheld unanimously by three members of the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, although one of the judges concurred
for different reasons.

The main ruling said Northwest has done its best to follow both bankruptcy
law - by getting a judge's permission to impose cuts - and airline labor law
- by trying to negotiate a new contract.

"Although this is a complicated case, one feature is simple enough to
describe: Northwest's flight attendants have proven intransigent in the face
of Northwest's manifest need to reorganize," the judges wrote. They wrote
that the union must try harder to convince its members of the need for the
cuts.

The ruling leaves the Association of Flight Attendants to decide whether to
appeal to the Supreme Court or wait for one of its other strategies at
Northwest to pay off. Those include seeking a right to strike if mediators
declare an impasse, or a request to U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper for
smaller pay cuts because Northwest's financial results have improved faster
than expected.

AFA General Counsel David Borer said the union was weighing its options.

"None of the courts have told us we can never strike, all they've said is we
have to first exhaust this process" at the National Mediation Board, he
said.

Northwest said it was pleased, and that its "central goal remains to reach a
consensual agreement with our flight attendants." Spokesman Dean Breest
confirmed that the goal for any deal remains the same - $195 million a year
in savings from flight attendants.

Charles Craver, a labor law professor at George Washington University, said
it was a tough case in a little-tested area of the law.

"They're trying to keep the parties from striking for fear that if they do
the entire company will go down, and that would defeat the whole purpose of
bankruptcy," he said.

Concessions from workers helped Northwest report a $301 million pretax
profit in 2006, not counting bankruptcy expenses. But bankruptcy expenses
gave it a loss of $2.84 billion. On Thursday it reported a $33 million loss
for the month of February, but that included a $48 million charge for
reorganization expenses.

Northwest has said it plans to give 4,000 non-union employees $77.4 million
in cash and stock as part of a bonus program after it emerges from
bankruptcy. And it has not revealed details of its plan to compensate
executives, although it has withdrawn a $129 million bankruptcy claim it
planned to submit on their behalf.

"If they cannot spare a penny for flight attendants, then in no sense can
they give millions of dollars to management," Borer said.

 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com