[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Gary/Chicago Airport growth on track despite railroads"
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Airport growth on track despite railroads
By Michelle L. Quinn
The Gary (IN) Post-Tribune
GARY -- A glitch in negotiations between the Gary/Chicago International
Airport and three railroads regarding the airport expansion shouldn't
cause any setbacks on its construction.
The Airport Authority at its Wednesday meeting discussed the issue
concerning the expansion, which will move a large stretch of track on
which EJ&E, Norfolk Southern and CSX use. The railroads, according to
Airport Administrator Chris Curry, are at odds over which railroad will
control the right-of-way once the track is relocated.
In its present form, the expansion calls for the EJ&E track to form a
junction with the CSX track, Curry said. Currently, CSX doesn't use its
line but does have a hold on it for possible future needs.
EJ&E, however, doesn't want CSX to control the junction.
Authority member Ross Amundson said that whether the airport goes ahead
with the expansion using the original plan or modifies it to address the
railroads' concerns, the Authority isn't going to allow the railroads to
stall work needlessly.
"If it was up to me, I'd be out there running the bulldozer myself,"
said Authority President Marion Johnson Jr. "This is something all of us
have dreamed about, so I want it done as quickly as possible."
A second expansion-related relocation will be less problematic but will
cost $2,452,832, as the Authority approved a request to move a fuel tank
owned by CITGO that's currently within the proposed runway's protection
zone. Airport engineer Ken Ross said CITGO handled the bids for its
relocation and has asked the Authority to put money in a draw account so
that it could make payments progressively.
The tank's relocation will be paid from RDA funds, Ross said.
In other business, the airport received an unexpected windfall of
$52,000, courtesy of Pan Am Airlines.
The airport in October received a default judgment in Lake Superior
Court against Pan Am for landing fees it still owed after it left the
city, Curry said. The judgment required the airline, whose hub is now
located in Portsmouth, N.H., to make four payments of $13,000; the
airport received the last payment March 2.
The payments eased any hard feelings the airport may have had for the
airline.
"They were the first to recognize the potential Gary has," Amundson said.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com