[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Airlines stretched so thin that one piece out of place throws themoff"
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Airlines stretched so thin that one piece out of place throws them off
By Dan Reed
USA TODAY
Charlie Miller could be a poster child for nightmarish air travel during
the winter now drawing to a close.
A hospital consultant from Barneveld, N.Y., Miller got caught in the
Dec. 20 blizzard that closed Denver International Airport for more than
two days. Told by his carrier, Continental Airlines, that it would be
Christmas night before it could get him home, Miller eventually set out
on his own.
He managed to get home late on Christmas Eve. But to do it, he had to
sleep two nights at the airport, check in at two high-priced hotels, pay
$150 for an 8-mile cab ride in Denver, buy a first-class ticket on
United, fly to Los Angeles, then connect through Philadelphia. His total
extra cost: $3,000.
"I know weather is not covered" by the airline's policy for compensating
displaced travelers because it is beyond their control. "But everyone
was so rude and uncooperative," Miller said.
The travel collapse precipitated by recession and terrorism in 2001 has
prompted draconian reductions by an industry that lost $35 billion over
the five years ended in 2005. Domestic airlines are operating smaller
fleets and filling more seats on the average flight. They've shed
154,000 workers, become heavily reliant on do-it-yourself ticketing and
shifted some of their telephone reservations work offshore and to
part-timers working from their homes.
The retrenchment has brought most airlines in the USA back to thin
profitability. But it also has created an industry that is running full
tilt all the time and more vulnerable to breakdowns when faced with
adversity.
Lesser events than that pre-Christmas blizzard in Denver have disrupted
air travel this winter. Hundreds of thousands of air travelers had their
lives knocked off course this winter by a dust storm that closed
Dallas/Fort Worth airport, an ice storm that slowed operations at New
York John F. Kennedy on Valentine's Day and a flawed computer
switch-over by US Airways last week.
It's not just the cutbacks that limit airlines' ability to bounce back
from adversity. Outmoded systems for controlling aircraft on the ground
and in the air, along with airport growth that lags behind the increase
in passenger traffic, leave the aviation industry today with almost no
margin for error.
R. John Hansman, an information technology and aviation expert at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says the nation's air travel
system is approaching capacity.
It's operating so close to the edge, Hansman says, that when any little
thing goes wrong in one location, things are prone to go wrong across a
whole region or even the nation.
Traveler Jan Harrison, a corporate trainer from Poulsbo, Wash., who
twice last month was thrown off schedule by long delays at Salt Lake
City and Chicago, puts it another way: "The entire system is so
stretched, so understaffed, without room to flex. If it's sunny, and not
too windy, and everybody does his or her job exactly right at exactly
the right time, and the passengers can board themselves quickly and
without any issues … well, maybe we have a chance to take off on time."
*Fewer flights *
Almost 684 million people boarded commercial planes in the USA through
the first 11 months of last year, according to the most recent numbers
from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. That's more than the
record 670 million boardings in all of 2005. But there were 3% fewer
flights operated last year than in 2005.
Thus, planes last year were more full than in 2005. U.S. airlines filled
a record 79.4% of their seats in the first 11 months of 2006. That
average masks the fact that on the most popular routes, flights
typically ran close to 100% full.
Though U.S. carriers are filling eight out of 10 seats on average, they
remain barely profitable. In 2006, the industry profit margin was less
than 2%, according to preliminary industry estimates.
All those packed planes create a huge problem when weather or other
events cause airlines to go off schedule. There simply aren't enough
readily available seats to accommodate all the displaced travelers.
Miller, the New York consultant, was told he'd have a five-day wait in
the pre-Christmas travel rush. Waits of 24 to 48 hours to get a rebooked
seat are more common.
Part of the current problem with air travel may be one of perception.
Delays caused by weather or other unexpected events are inherent in any
form of travel. And whenever they begin to pile up in air travel, as
they have this winter, the negative headlines seem to stack up almost as
deep as the stranded passengers. Frequently, they become part of the
national conversation.
For example, the Valentine's Day ice storm in New York triggered a
six-day near-meltdown of JetBlue's operations. CEO David Neeleman spent
three days apologizing publicly. He went on CBS' /Late Show with David
Letterman/ after Letterman had been particularly biting in his criticism.
*Rare events *
Statistically speaking, such events are rare. Last year, only about 10
out of every 10,000 flights were delayed more than two hours, according
to the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. But that, says airline
consultant Ira Gershkoff, a former airline operations executive who now
leads JIT Airline Resources, does not entitle airlines to a free pass.
Says Gershkoff: "When there's a big tornado and 20 people get hurt or
killed, we don't minimize it by saying it's only 0.02% of the local
population, or whatever. So this is a legitimate issue."
For the most part, travelers seem to have taken well to today's
do-it-yourself ticketing. American, for example, says 80% of its
passengers avoid airport counters by using kiosks, the Internet or
for-pay curbside services to check in.
But when things go wrong, the few agents working can be overwhelmed.
That's because, in percentage terms, the biggest personnel cutbacks
during the first half of the decade were among gate agents and telephone
reservationists, according to industry data.
Mike Maloney, a beverage industry sales executive from Overland Park,
Kan., says communication from the airline in such situations has become
a huge problem.
When a scheduled six-hour trip home recently from Fort Lauderdale took
12 hours because of mechanical problems with two different planes and a
de-icing delay at American's Dallas/Fort Worth hub, he and other
travelers were kept in the dark. "Getting simple and accurate
information to the customer doesn't seem to be their priority," he says.
"No wonder people are pushing (Congress) for a passenger's bill of rights."
Jerry Quintiliani, a chemical salesman from Peoria, Ill., says he
increasingly is "flabbergasted" by the way airlines and their front-line
agents deal with delays.
A recent flight home from Chicago's O'Hare was canceled because of bad
weather. The lone agent at the gate rebuffed requests for help in
finding other flights, hotel rooms or rental cars on a night when all
were in short supply.
Quintiliani eventually got home by teaming with two similarly desperate
strangers. They rented a car and drove. "We got no help from the airline
at all," he adds. "We know you can't control the weather, but at least
give us an idea of what we can expect. And be nice about it."
David Castelveter, spokesman for the Air Transport Association, the
airlines' main trade group, agrees that the margin for error has
narrowed. He says problems with quickly rebooking delayed fliers are the
result of carriers filling such a high percentage of seats. In filling
planes fuller, airlines are "providing our customers what they say they
want most: cheap fares."
He says the delays are largely the result of governments failing to
invest enough, and move fast enough, in updating the USA's aviation
infrastructure. He says delays will get worse "until we modernize our
air traffic control system." The industry is urging Congress to include
more money for system modernization in pending legislation reauthorizing
the Federal Aviation Administration.
*Placing blame *
But consultant Gershkoff says airlines can't blame it all on the
weather, government and customers' desires for cheap fares. They've
invested heavily in sophisticated technology for running normal
operations but little on technology to help them manage the complex
recovery process.
"No airline has a decent method" for recovering, he says. "They just
say, 'Get these planes out as soon as possible.' There's no strategic plan."
His firm is one of several developing information-management tools that
could help them decide faster when to delay or cancel flights, plus when
and how to reorder operations to quickly reposition planes and crews
where they're needed.
Sabre Airline Solutions, a travel industry consultant, says each minute
of delay costs an airline $70, on average, and that delays and
cancellations chew up more than 2% of airline revenue each year.
To reduce those costs and improve customer service, Sabre is developing
tools to rearrange the itineraries of hundreds of displaced passengers
in mere minutes.
Currently, that process can take several hours and be "quite an
emotional experience for both the traveler and the agents helping them,"
says Gordon Locke, a Sabre vice president. "Think of it: Passengers
could be handed their new itineraries and boarding passes as they exit
the plane upon returning to the terminal."
Not all passengers would like the solution worked out for them by the
Sabre technology, Locke concedes. But those who do will be on their way
quickly, giving airline agents more time to deal with travelers who need
to make different arrangements.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com