[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Suit tells of trouble in airport security"
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Suit tells of trouble in airport security
Fired TSA worker claims harassment, retaliation in Colonie
By MICHELE MORGAN BOLTON
The Albany (NY) Times Union
ALBANY -- David Erickson earned two Bronze Stars for heroism in the first
Gulf War, leading a tank brigade of 300 soldiers and 150 vehicles into
battle.
Back on American soil, though, in 2003, the 47-year-old retired major found
himself waging a very different war, this one, allegedly, against three
supervisors intent on harassing employees at Albany International Airport.
Erickson, of Altamont, is suing U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Director Michael Chertoff, claiming he was fired from a job as a
Transportation Security Administration screener manager at the Colonie
facility because he wouldn't go along with the harassment.
Subsequently, Erickson himself was targeted and fired, because he objected
to, and reported, the hostile work environment, according to court papers.
Erickson was told he was being canned for misconduct and scheduling errors,
accusations he vehemently denies. "Whenever someone was sick, what they
wanted was for me to write them up," he said.
That included one woman who had available time, and was battling cancer, and
a man who was attending the funeral of a family member, he said: "It's wrong
in America for this to happen. This is not just about me, but about the 50
or 60 people they got rid of, before I left.
"For a lot of people," he went on, "that was all they had."
Within six months of Erickson's employment at the airport, he went from an
outstanding employee to the dregs, said attorney Steve DiNigris of
Washington, D.C., "simply because he would not target females and others for
improper treatment by the named supervisors in the complaint."
The federal lawsuit filed late Friday says Erickson's personnel file was
loaded with trumped-up bad work reviews and complaints that eventually got
him fired. He seeks $300,000 in damages as well as lost wages.
Erickson's claim comes under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
amended in 1991, that protects employees from being abused in the workplace
and from being targeted for trying to stick up for others.
The federal government took control of security at airports to improve
passenger and luggage screening in the shadow of the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks. But since then, TSA workers claim, operations at Albany
International have been chaotic.
A 2004 Homeland Security investigation that centered on allegations of
cronyism and coercion cleared the facility's TSA managers of wrongdoing. But
federal authorities declined to release their report, saying it was
classified as "security sensitive."
The 2004 investigation came at the urging of U.S. Rep. John Sweeney,
R-Clifton Park, who is a member of the House Select Committee on Homeland
Security.
Issues raised by screeners also include complaints that security violations
routinely go unreported. On Monday, Sweeney said he remains unsatisfied with
the response to the ongoing issues between management and TSA screeners at
the airport.
He said he is extremely displeased that issues are ongoing "after receiving
false promises from TSA that they would be addressed."
In an Oct. 10 letter to TSA Assistant Administrator Peter Iovino, sent after
his staff met with screeners, Sweeney called for the DHS inspector general
to resume the original inquiry: "I believe it is unacceptable to stand idly
by while Albany International continues to lose good men and women."
To date, Sweeney said, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission has
received five complaints from TSA employees; four of them are from women.
Things are so bad he said prospective workers repeatedly fail assessments of
their abilities, yet are hired anyway for a lack of good candidates.
Supervisors take and retake tests to raise their scores in order to keep
their jobs, he said.
Former screeners, including Erickson, have accused TSA managers of
manipulating internal investigations to guarantee some workers would lose
their jobs. Dozens were fired or forced to resign for a series of alleged
violations that included sexual harassment, misconduct, credit card fraud,
drug abuse and lying on job applications.
Among the managers named in the lawsuit is Paul B. Varville, the airport's
TSA director. He has defended the firings and contends the allegations are
baseless. Varville didn't return a call on Monday; TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis
said she can't comment on pending litigation.
Also under fire are Richard Alhborn, Varville's assistant, and Michael A.
Klusacek, the scheduling operations officer and acting deputy director. Some
former workers accuse Klusacek -- a former State Police internal affairs
investigator -- of coercing false statements against employees to get them
fired. In the past, TSA officials denied the allegations.
Klusacek has since been reassigned as an aviation security inspector.
Along with money damages, Erickson has requested a jury trial. He wants the
derogatory statements, letters, e-mails and official performance review
files to be removed from his employment file, and for the Department of
Homeland Security to be enjoined from any further retaliation.
Erickson said he began work at the airport Nov. 2, 2002, and by Jan. 15,
2003, had already received an "exceeding the standards" rating by the
defendants. Later that January, though, he said he began to notice what
upper management was doing.
TSA's turnover rate is 40 percent, he said: "You can't tell me that all
those people are bad."
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com