[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Homeland Security bill helps 9/11 lawsuits"


 
Monday, October 9, 2006

Homeland Security bill helps 9/11 lawsuits
By Shaun Waterman
United Press International


A little-noticed provision of the Homeland Security Appropriations Act
signed by the president last week will help move forward a
multibillion-dollar September 11 lawsuit against two U.S. airlines by making
it easier for plaintiffs to get restricted information about the nation's
pre-attack aviation security system. 

Section 525 of the conference report that is part of the law, instructs
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to draft within 30 days new
regulations for the system of sensitive security information, or SSI,
administered by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). 

The regulations, says the report, should provide for the release of most SSI
more than three years old, unless the information is still current or the
secretary makes a written determination that it must stay protected. To do
so, he must provide "a rational reason," which will "identify and describe
the specific risk to the national transportation system." 

The regulations should also include a mechanism for SSI to be made available
in civil court cases if the judge determines it is needed and if the party
needing it cannot get it elsewhere without "undue hardship." The lawmakers
say they "expect that a party will be able to demonstrate undue hardship to
the judge if equivalent information is not available in one month's time." 

To get access to the information, plaintiff's lawyers will have to pass a
background check of criminal and terrorism-suspect watchlists like that any
aviation worker with access to the information would require, according to
the report.
The language still allows officials to block the court's access to SSI, if
they can "demonstrate" that it "presents a risk of harm to the nation." 

The new law instructs Mr. Chertoff to report back to the Appropriations
committees within 120 days on his compliance.
 
The provision was welcomed by relatives of victims of the September 11
attacks. Family members who support the lawsuits have long contended that
the TSA is using restrictions on information to hide the culpability of the
airlines and the federal authorities. 

"We call on TSA to comply fully with both the letter and the spirit of this
new law," said Alice Hoagland, mother of Mark Bingham. 

Her son was one of the United Airlines Flight 93 passengers who stormed the
cockpit, preventing the hijackers from striking their intended target --
thought to have been either the White House or the Capitol. 

"This is information about a defunct aviation system," said former Federal
Aviation Administration Special Agent Brian Sullivan of the documents that
TSA is trying to protect. He accused officials of "protecting the FAA from
embarrassment and the airlines from liability." 

About 60 cases in which relatives of the victims of the September 11 attacks
are suing United and American Airlines have been consolidated in the U.S.
District Court of New York. The plaintiffs say the airlines' negligence
allowed the attackers to board with the short knives and box cutters used in
the attacks.

 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com