[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Security Generates Multibillion Business"


 
Monday, September 11, 2006

Security Generates Multibillion Business 
By Gary Stoller
USA TODAY


Albuquerque-based ICx MesoSystems in 2000 sold about 10 of its air-sampling
devices capable of sniffing out bioterrorism agents.

In the five years since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the company has
sold about 600 to federal, state and local agencies, driving up its sales
this year to $7 million, or more than triple what they were in 2000.

"The events of 9/11 made everyone understand the importance of our product
and sharpened their focus on homeland security," says CEO Chuck Call.

Five years after the terrorist attacks, the homeland security business is
booming, and now it eclipses mature enterprises like movie-making and the
music industry in annual revenue.

The business has moved from a frantic and often inefficient scramble in the
wake of 9/11 to shore up security at airports to a much broader effort. The
scope of security-related spending has expanded to include more
sophisticated information technology and the protection of other vulnerable
terrorist targets such as ports and nuclear reactors. And spending for
anti-terrorism goods and services is expected to keep growing.

Governments and businesses worldwide expect this year to spend $59 billion
to thwart terrorists, nearly a sixfold increase from 2000, according to
industry tracker Homeland Security Research of Washington, D.C. By contrast,
the motion-picture and music industries each generate about $40 billion
annually. The research company expects homeland security spending to nearly
double by 2010.

"It's one of the fastest-growing industries," says Tomer Amit, vice
president of Homeland Security Research. Where the money is going:

*The companies benefiting range from big corporations such as Lockheed
Martin to small companies such as ICx MesoSystems, which employs 35 people.
Consultant Accenture has moved in five years from no involvement with
homeland security to being one of the major contractors.

"The big winners of the homeland security windfall have, as usual, been the
big contractors," says Dan Verton, founder of Homeland Defense Week, a
website that broadcasts security news.

*Airport security was the initial focus, but the industry has expanded into
a wide range of companies hawking all kinds of products and services for
securing nearly every imaginable terrorist target.

The homeland security industry now includes chemical, biological and
radiological detection, as well as border, rail, seaport, industrial and
nuclear plant security. Other vendors include computer and human resources
experts, boat makers for the Coast Guard, information and integrated
technology companies, and myriad consultants.

*As the biggest customer in the field, the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, a post-9/11 creation, has played a major role in shaping the
industry.

The agency has spent $28 billion over the 22-month period ended in August on
security-related goods and services while issuing more than 115,000
contracts.

This year's contracts include: a $385 million award to Halliburton
subsidiary KBR to establish temporary detention and processing capabilities
in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants, and a $308 million to
$750 million contract with Unisys to continue building, securing and
managing the information technology infrastructure for the Department of
Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration, one of its
agencies.

*U.S. companies are benefiting most. The U.S. market will generate $29.1
billion in revenue this year from "the threat of terror," and U.S. companies
will receive nearly all of it, Amit says. About 70% will come from federal,
state and local government contracts.

$2 billion contract up for grabs

Five big corporations are battling for a $2 billion contract with the
Homeland Security department to provide surveillance of the nation's
borders, to be awarded this month. The government expects the winning
contractor to develop a blueprint to protect the borders and to integrate
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency's personnel, infrastructure,
technology and rapid response capability.

The bidders are Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and
wireless-equipment provider Ericsson.

Two years ago, another big corporation, Accenture, won potentially the
largest contract in the Department of Homeland Security's short history.
Accenture plans to use biometrics and other technology to process foreign
visitors as they enter the country. The contract could run as long as 10
years and generate up to $10 billion for the company.

Accenture so far has received $185 million in revenue from the deal, says
Jim Stolarski, Accenture's executive director of homeland security. He said
the company will receive far less than the maximum.

Accenture, which had no employees dedicated to homeland security prior to
the 2001 terrorist attacks, now has 20 senior executives and about 600
workers working for Stolarski.

"DHS is one of our largest and most important clients," says Stolarski,
whose company reported revenue of $15.5 billion last year.

The opportunities continue to open, too, for ICx MesoSystems, the small
Albuquerque company.

It's now marketing another air-sampling device for office buildings, a
venture that "wouldn't be a possibility without an event like 9/11," CEO
Call says.

But it's been rocky at times for Call's company. Sales spiked after 9/11 but
then fell when a Defense Department official became concerned about false
alarms from various companies' bioterrorism devices. Officials temporarily
put a hold on purchases of all such equipment, Call says.

The CEO says he's now optimistic about sales growth, but "it always takes
longer than you'd hope to introduce a new technology."

Contracts often go to big companies

After the Sept. 11 attacks, the government was in a "panicky phase" of
procurement, says David Silverberg, editor of HSToday, a homeland security
trade magazine. The country "had to do everything instantly, because many
thought we were going to be nuked off the face of the Earth." As a result,
he says, the homeland security industry "has grown at an extremely fast and
disorganized pace."

But more recently, spending is being shaped by both successes and failures
in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. This year, for example, has seen
introduction of a second generation of anti-terrorism products, including
walk-through baggage-screening portals at airports, and devices that can
detect nuclear and biological threats.

Consultant Doug Laird, who worked for the U.S. Secret Service and was
Northwest Airlines' security director, criticizes the Department of Homeland
Security for awarding so many contracts to large corporations.

In general, he says, the contractors oversell the security value of their
goods and services. Further, he says, the government exercises inadequate
oversight.

"The DHS has pretty much given them an open check to supply products and
services," he says.

Often, the large corporations "have no idea about" the work that needs to be
done, Laird says. "In my opinion, it's a total rip-off."

The department's chief procurement officer, Elaine Duke, says the agency
awards contracts based on "best value," and also makes sure that contractors
or their subcontractors have the technical expertise required.

In June, the department selected 25 large companies to provide information
technology under a contract worth about $45 billion over seven years. Small
companies will also get some of the work.

During the fiscal year ending this month, small companies have been awarded
direct contracts that represent 33% of all contract dollars spent by the
department.

That surpasses a U.S. Small Business Administration goal of each federal
agency awarding at least 23% of its contracts to small businesses, she says.

In addition, Duke says, the department requires large companies in
"virtually every contract" to subcontract to small businesses 40% of the
contract's value.

Bryan Ware, CEO of Virginia-based Digital Sandbox, a small business that
does risk-assessment work for the department, doesn't agree that small
businesses are being shut out, but he's aware that large corporations are
benefiting the most.

"The big boys are taking the lion's share of the business, but you won't
find a different story in any part of the federal government," he says.

Officials of Lockheed Martin, one of the 25 companies selected, say it makes
sense that the giant defense contractor has been selected for numerous
Homeland Security contracts.

The company has expertise in many areas and successfully completed contracts
for various agencies before they were combined within one department after
9/11, says Senior Vice President Art Johnson. Many small companies "have
tremendous capabilities," and Lockheed Martin often teams with them on large
contracts, he says.

Global threat remains

Without another major terrorist attack like those of 9/11, Homeland Security
Research, the industry tracker, expects the market for security goods and
services to increase to $178 billion in 2015, or triple its current value.

But a major attack in the United States, Europe or Japan could increase the
global market in 2015 to $730 billion, more than a twelvefold increase, the
company says.

Most of the growth this decade will come from building what Homeland
Security Research calls "a homeland defense infrastructure." Growth areas
are likely to include technology for surveillance and for detection of
nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, Amit says.

That differs from the last five years, when the growth came mainly from
airport security, information technology and combating bioterrorism with
detection devices and stockpiling of vaccines.

The homeland security business is much bigger in the USA than in any country
or region abroad, but that's changing. Rapid growth is expected in Europe,
India and China. The USA will make up only 42% of the global market in 2015,
Amit predicts.

Spending growth abroad, he said, will be driven by a variety of perceived
terrorism threats, he says.

Western European countries have "a substantial population of Middle Eastern
immigrants that can harbor terrorist cells," Amit says.

As economies of India and China grow rapidly, crime is rising and both are
expected to join other Asian nations in an effort to combat crime and
terrorism, he says.

Also, India has been embroiled in a long-running conflict with Pakistan over
the region of Kashmir, he says.

The recent alleged plot to use liquid explosives to blow up U.S. airliners
over the Atlantic will maintain the industry's steady growth, Amit says.

"It quiets the critics who say too much money is being spent on homeland
security," he says. "The threat is not going away."

Attached Photo:

Yotam Margalit, director of marketing for General Electric's homeland
security group, works with the General Electric prototype probe for the
Streetlab substance identification system at San Francisco International
Airport on Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2006 in San Francisco. The terrorist attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001, ushered in a clampdown at the nation's airports and a new
era of aggravation at security checkpoints. They also launched a research
and development race for better screening technology that has accelerated
with each thwarted terrorism plot.

1157998928307_091106Security.jpg


Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com