[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Airlines Yet to Climb out of 9/11 Woes"


 
Monday, September 11, 2006

Airlines Yet to Climb out of 9/11 Woes 
By Terry Maxon
The Dallas (TX) Morning News


The U.S. airline industry was in serious trouble after the terrorist attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001.

All flights were grounded that morning - and kept grounded for several days.
Even after they returned to the skies, fewer people flew, and airline losses
mounted.

A full five years later, the industry remains distressed.

Carriers fly over a greatly changed landscape, with most players battered
and still trying to recover from the worst period in the history of
commercial aviation.

Airline consultant Michael Boyd of Evergreen, Colo., says the industry has
been changed forever by the events of 2001 and afterward.

"Right after 9/11, the shutdown damn near killed the airline business. The
slowdown after that in revenue drained cash, and then add to that, in the
last two years, fuel prices going up," Mr. Boyd said. "All those events
basically ended up with airlines changing the way they do business."

As an example, airlines used to have "relatively good compensation" and good
benefits, he said.

"Those days - at least for now - are over. You're dealing with a situation
where the market cannot support the cost structure that was there before,
and airlines have adjusted to that," said Mr. Boyd, president of the Boyd
Group.

Not all the things that have happened to the airline industry since 2001 can
be blamed on the events of 9/11. The industry peaked in 1998 and 1999, when
U.S. carriers reported net income of $10.3 billion on revenue of more than
$233 billion.

As the technology boom collapsed in 2000, industry profits dropped to $2.5
billion, less than half the $5.4 billion net income from 1999, even though
revenue climbed to $131 billion from $119 billion.

"The downturn started in the spring of 2000," consultant Michael Roach said.
"It started more than a year before 9/11. 9/11 was not the cause. Obviously,
it was a horrible event and seriously exacerbated things. But the industry
was well into a down cycle."

While the terrorist attack "made it the down cycle to end all down cycles,"
Mr. Roach said it would be a "huge mistake to say 9/11 caused the current
industry distress or the current down cycle caused the industry distress."

Instead, he said, "it was caused by years of letting costs get out of
control in the belief that higher revenues would surely save the day."

In fact, fares on an inflation-adjusted basis have been declining regularly
since the 1920s, said Mr. Roach, a founder and partner in the San
Francisco-based aviation consultancy of Roach and Sbarra.

For 2001, the U.S. industry piled up an $8.2 billion loss, eclipsing the
record losses of $4.8 billion posted by airlines in 1992. Between Jan. 1,
2001, and Dec. 31, 2005, carriers as a group lost nearly $35 billion.

What has made the industry's current problems unique is the length and depth
of the downturn. U.S. carriers as a group have lost money for five straight
years.

Bankruptcy beckoned

The previous worst period, 1990-1993, coincided with the first Persian Gulf
War, a slow economy and an airfare battle in 1992 that featured a half-price
sale that ruined the summer travel season for airlines. The four-year loss
totaled less than $13 billion.

The previous downturn caused a number of bankruptcies. The nation's
fifth-largest carrier at the time, Continental Airlines Inc., survived, but
several others, including aviation pioneers Pan American World Airways Inc.
and Eastern Airlines Inc., never made it out of bankruptcy court.

But that round of failures was restricted to middle-tier or smaller
carriers. In the latest downturn, the nation's biggest carriers were hit.

No. 2 United Airlines Inc., No. 3 Delta Air Lines Inc. and No. 4 Northwest
Airlines Inc. all headed into bankruptcy court to reorganize their finances
and slash their expenses.

No. 1 American avoided bankruptcy only through hard-nosed bargaining that
won $1.6 billion in concessions from employees and hundreds of millions of
dollars in cuts elsewhere.

"The big event, the combination of bad things - starting with the end of the
dot-com boom and then the fuel costs - has really forced the industry to
face up to the fact that its costs were out of control," Mr. Roach said.

The rapid rise in fuel costs has caused a cruel irony for carriers after
they beat down their costs sharply in other areas. Had fuel prices stayed at
2002 levels, most carriers would be hugely profitable now. Instead, most are
still trying to keep their heads above water.

As an example, American's revenue was $20.7 billion last year, $1 billion
higher than in 2000, when it reported net income of $813 million. But
American didn't make money in 2005, even with the higher revenue - instead,
it lost $861 million.

Its operating costs other than fuel purchases totaled $15.2 billion in 2005,
less than its nonfuel expenses of $15.8 billion five years earlier. The
problem? Its fuel bill in 2005 reached $5.6 billion, up 125 percent compared
with the $2.5 billion spent in 2000, even though its flying increased only
10 percent during the same period.

Southwest Airlines Co., whose costs in most areas were less than those of
its larger rivals, used fuel hedging in particular to restrain its expenses.
While its fuel costs rose two-thirds during the same period, up $538
million, its revenue increased even more, by $2.1 billion.

As a result, Southwest earned $2 billion in net income over the previous
five years, compared with American's $8.1 billion in losses.

Although some have written off the so-called legacy carriers - the big
airlines created before the industry was deregulated in 1978 - Mr. Boyd said
that segment has the brightest future.

"They've shed their costs. They've shed a lot of the ways they've done
business before. That means, going forward, they can start making operating
profits at $65 a barrel [of oil], which is an achievement," Mr. Boyd said.

Mr. Boyd, who calls the old-line carriers such as American, United and Delta
"comprehensive network carriers," said their networks will generate enormous
revenue from small towns to big towns, from U.S. cities to international
destinations.

Thinner bench

Newer carriers such as AirTran Holdings Inc., Frontier Airlines Inc. and
JetBlue Airways Corp. are losing their lower-cost advantage over their older
competitors, and they don't have the extensive international networks to
garner as much revenue, he said. They're also facing more competition as
they grow, with fewer markets to enter, he said.

"Between Southwest, JetBlue and AirTran, there are 250 more big airplanes on
order, big being 100 seats and above," he said. "Now they're fighting with
each other. Why is Southwest in Denver? Because they have to be."

The future is dimmest for regional carriers whose fleets are filled with
small jets of 50 seats or less, Mr. Boyd said.

Mr. Roach said the industry's transition "is not over yet."

Delta and Northwest still haven't made it out of bankruptcy, and many
experts believe the industry will consolidate further, he said.

Mr. Roach said the industry's fortunes seem to be on a slight upswing. But
he finds it worrisome that most carriers haven't had a chance to reduce
their debt.

"One could argue that they missed most of the current up-trend in the
economy, which is starting to look a little long in the tooth," Mr. Roach
said.

"They haven't built up their balance sheets the way they normally do in good
times. They need a few more good years, and it's not looking clear that
they'll be getting them."

Attached Photo:

The empty American Airlines terminal at Dallas Fort Worth Airport on the
morning of Sept. 11, 2001, after the FAA grounded all non-military air
traffic in the United States following the terrorist attacks in New York and
Washington.

1158000499909_091106Terminal.jpg


Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com