[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Auditor Disputes San Diego Airport Officials' Ethics Claims"
Thursday, September 7, 2006
Auditor Disputes Airport Officials' Claims
By ROB DAVIS
The Voice of San Diego (CA)
The auditor who conducted the internal investigation into possible ethics
breaches by airport authority officials challenged Wednesday public
statements made by two top authority officials who said that his audit found
no wrongdoing.
Auditor Mark Burchyett declined to discuss the findings of his completed
audit, but said some officials did not cooperate with his probe into
allegations that airport authority officials traded on their positions to
get favors from airlines. He said his audit is awaiting a review by the
authority's legal counsel and that he would discuss it at a future date.
Burchyett would not say which officials refused to cooperate.
But he disputed the comments of two San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority officials -- spokeswoman Diana Lucero and Chairman Joe W. Craver
-- who characterized the audit as finding no wrongdoing or ethics breaches.
"That doesn't clearly say what's in the report," Burchyett said. "... There
are some caveats to what I could do. There were some limitations because
some parties wouldn't cooperate."
Lucero and Craver's comments came in response to a lawsuit filed by a former
authority official that contained allegations of the ethical breaches. They
both declined comment Wednesday.
Burchyett, who is employed by the authority's board -- not President/CEO
Thella Bowens -- does not have subpoena power. That would give him the
ability to compel testimony. He said he had that power while previously
working as an auditor in Missouri, but had not been given it here.
Burchyett's investigation came after former employee Jose Hernandez filed a
claim with the authority in July, alleging that he was forced to resign
after blowing the whistle on ethics violations by Craver, Bowens, authority
attorney Breton Lobner, board member Morris Vance and other authority staff
members.
Hernandez, 35, who oversaw airport parking, ground transportation and
terminal building space, resigned in February. He claims that those
authority officials violated the authority's ethics policy by seeking
special favors from airlines such as upgrades, lounge access and free
shipping.
Hernandez reiterated his claims in a wrongful termination suit filed against
the authority Friday in San Diego Superior Court. He is seeking unspecified
damages. In his suit, Hernandez alleges that Craver was fearful that the FBI
was intercepting his communications and misused authority funds by
requesting sweeps for listening devices.
Craver is a former chairman of both a task force on city finances and a
public facilities finance board, two groups that have been entangled in the
city's ongoing financial and legal crises. Craver, who has been forced to
hire a taxpayer-financed attorney in relation to federal investigations of
City Hall, acknowledged Tuesday that the authority's offices were swept for
listening devices.
While Hernandez's suit alleges that Craver was fearful the FBI would
intercept his communications, Craver said he became concerned about security
in the authority offices after his BlackBerry went missing overnight.
Craver said confidential discussions occurring in authority offices about
legal claims such as slip-and-fall cases have a right to be kept secret. He
would not say whether any bugs were found, declining further comment
Wednesday.
Officials at several local government agencies that handle similar claims
said Wednesday that their offices are never swept for bugs and that the
practice is not common.
Officials with the cities of San Diego and Chula Vista, as well as San Diego
County, the San Diego Association of Governments, the San Diego Unified Port
District and Los Angeles World Airports, which runs Los Angeles
International Airport, all said their offices are never swept for bugs.
"It is not a common government practice -- unless you are involved in
national security issues," said Fred Sainz, spokesman for San Diego Mayor
Jerry Sanders.
"Sweeping? For bugs? Never," said Irene McCormack, a port spokeswoman.
"We're not trying to hide anything here."
At least one local office does sweep for listening devices. Gail Stewart,
spokeswoman for the San Diego District Attorney, said offices there are
swept for bugs "as needed" and that the necessary equipment is kept on hand.
"It's not that unusual, actually," Stewart said.
Hernandez's wrongful termination suit also alleges that Bowens, the
authority's president, has wrongly used her position to request standby or
reduced-rate tickets for a sister in Texas. The suit says she purchased
tickets for her own travel, then requested upgrades and airport lounge
access "more than 30 times."
According to the suit, Bowens had airlines ship barbecue meat -- pork, beef
ribs and brisket -- for free from Angelo's, a favorite Dallas restaurant.
She formerly worked as budget administrator for the Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport. Hernandez claims that Bowens had 200 pounds of
barbecue meat shipped in for an annual employee appreciation barbecue.
Bowens did not return a call for comment.
Spokespeople for U.S. Airways and Hawaiian Airlines, which both serve San
Diego, said Wednesday that such perks are not extended to airport officials.
A spokesman for Northwest Airlines also said he did not believe such perks
were available to airports.
Media representatives for seven other major carriers that serve San Diego
did not return calls for comment.
Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Ian Gregor said the FAA does not
regulate perks between airlines and airports.
"We do regulate certain items that can be sent by air, such as hazardous
materials," Gregor wrote in an e-mail, "but BBQ doesn't qualify."
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com