[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Security in U.S. Airports to Intensify"


 
Friday, August 11, 2006

Security in U.S. Airports to Intensify 
Terror plot would have exploited remaining weaknesses in airline security
By LESLIE MILLER
The Associated Press


WASHINGTON, Since the Sept. 11 attacks, aviation security has been tightened
in many areas, but not all. Before they were foiled, terrorists apparently
planned to exploit some of the remaining weaknesses in aviation security by
assembling improvised bombs right inside airline passenger cabins.

The 2001 hijackings led to bulletproof cockpit doors. Machines that could
detect explosives in checked baggage were installed in commercial airports.
Sharp objects that could be used as weapons were banned, and better-trained
airport screeners were hired to look for them.

So it may have been predictable that terrorists would try something else:
smuggle aboard liquids that could be turned into explosives, put them
together with other bomb parts and then detonate them.

"We've armored the flight deck doors, so they won't take planes and use them
as weapons," said Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio, a leading Democrat on the
Homeland Security Committee. "Bag screening is better. The easiest way to do
it is on a person or carryon."

On Friday, security was expected to intensify in U.S. airports with airline
passengers facing a double-screening process, the head of the airline
industry's largest trade group said. The extra screening was designed to
keep passengers from carrying aboard any liquids that might be fashioned
into explosives.

Passengers and their carry-on luggage were to be examined not only at the
main security checkpoint but also a second time at the boarding gate. The
stepped-up screening began Thursday at 25 airports with flights bound for
Britain, according to James May, president of the Air Transport Association.

Intelligence had indicated the terror plot unfolding in Britain involved
using benign liquids that could be mixed inside an airplane cabin to make an
explosive.

Noting that terrorists repeat their tactics, DeFazio pointed to the
1994-1995 attempt to blow up a dozen airliners simultaneously over the
Pacific Ocean. The plot, code-named "Bojinka," involved liquid explosives
smuggled onto planes in bottles of contact lens solution.

The response to the latest terrorist threat produced long lines at airports
Thursday as security officials scrambled to put new measures in place and
passengers adjusted to perplexing new restrictions.

With a dearth of security equipment that can detect explosives on
passengers, U.S. security officials moved quickly to ban liquids from
passenger cabins. By day's end British Airways had banned carry-on bags from
all flights between the United States and Britain.

Earlier Thursday, carryons were barred from U.S.-bound flights to keep
passengers from carrying liquids onto aircraft. Then the ban was extended to
all flights between the United States and Britain.

British Airways carries by far the most passengers between the two
countries. The airline runs 80 flights daily between Britain and 19 U.S.
airports.

Pilots complained that they weren't told quickly enough about the threat.

"The pilots are the in-flight security coordinators," said Al Aitken, a
retired pilot who is a member of the Passenger Cargo Security Group, which
lobbies for better aviation security. "How can he be that without knowing
the latest information on the imminent threat? How can he brief his crew on
what to look for?"

Rafi Ron, former head of security at Israel's Ben Gurion Airport and now a
security consultant in Washington, said terrorists always try to exploit new
vulnerabilities.

"We've been investing 99.9 percent of our resources in technology with one
single purpose: the detection of weapons," Ron said. "Terrorists will always
be able to get around it."

Attached Photo:

Banned items.

imagea0a9ec75-b176-42e5-93f9-db4db74b0e42.jpg


Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com