[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Foiled terror plot on scale of 9/11"


 
Friday, August 11, 2006

Foiled terror plot on scale of 9/11
Arrests targeted alleged plot to blow up several transatlantic flights using
liquid explosives.
By Mark Rice-Oxley
The Christian Science Monitor 


LONDON - An alleged terror plot to blow up several transatlantic passenger
jets, which British police said they had thwarted on Thursday, would have
caused even greater casualties than 9/11, officials and experts say, marking
a chilling departure from smaller-scale terror attacks of recent years.
 
Thousands were stranded at Britain's biggest airports Thursday and delays
rippled across the US as flights were canceled and check-in security ramped
up to surreal proportions after police said they had arrested 21 suspects in
connection with a plot to smuggle liquid explosives onto several aircraft. 

Officials in London and Washington said the alleged plotters, many believed
to be British-born, had their sights on United, American, and Continental
flights. Simultaneous explosions were to have been caused by chemicals in
carry-on luggage. Officials monitored the plot for months before deciding
they had to move. 

Experts say that the foiled attack suggests Al Qaeda involvement. Aviation
is still a favored target for Al Qaeda acolytes bent on taking terrorism to
new heights.

"The best way to top the 9/11 event is to do it with civilian aircraft with
a lot of people on board," says Rolf Tophoven, a German terrorism expert.
"This will create huge damage on all kinds of economic and commercial
levels."

Bruce Hoffman, an expert on terrorism at the RAND Corp. in Washington, notes
that it's typical of Al Qaeda to go back to targets and improve their
techniques on past attacks. The successful attack on the USS Cole in 2000
followed a failed bid to sink the USS Sullivan in 1999. The 9/11 attack came
eight years after the limited attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.

This latest effort, he adds, is a carbon copy of the failed 1995 "Bojinka"
plot by Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, convicted of being the mastermind of the 1993
World Trade Center attack, to blow up 11 American airliners over the
Pacific, using plastic explosives.

Britain raised its terror alert levels to the highest notch, while the US
put a red alert - the first time that level was invoked - on flights from
Britain. All other US flights were one step below, at "orange."

US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Peter Clarke, deputy
assistant commissioner for Scotland Yard, said the plot was international in
scope and involved many people.

President Bush, in Wisconsin, said that the US was safer than it was before
9/11. "We've taken a lot of measures to protect the American people but
obviously we're not completely safe," he said. But, he added, "It is a
mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America."

Officials would not say exactly how many aircraft were targeted, nor when
precisely they thought the plotters would strike. French officials said
Thursday that the plotters were probably of Pakistani origin. British
officials refused comment.

The number of suspects involved points to a far bigger operation than the
post-9/11 terror attacks in London; Madrid; Bali; and Casablanca, Morocco.
Paul Wilkinson, a security expert and author of "Terrorism Versus
Democracy," says: "It's the scale of conspiracy that is so worrying because
it's much larger than most things we've seen since 9/11."

Yet attacking aviation targets has proved harder since 9/11 because of
heightened security. To subvert that vigilance, the plotters arrested
Thursday were allegedly planning to smuggle aboard different liquid
chemicals that may appear innocuous but could be explosive if mixed.

As a result, passengers with babies Thursday were ordered to take a swig of
their baby formula in front of security guards to demonstrate its integrity.
Personal documents, medication, and all other hand luggage was banned from
flights out of Britain.

The unraveling of the plot marks another apparent success for British
counterterrorism, which already claims to have foiled a dozen or so attacks
since 9/11, four in the past year. While some of these have produced no
convictions and inconclusive evidence, security expert Bob Ayers says this
one should be taken seriously.

"You don't take a decision to shut down all flights to America lightly,"
says Mr. Ayers, an expert with the Chatham House think tank. "It would
suggest they have substantial evidence."

He adds that British intelligence must have somehow infiltrated the plotters
- a major success for organizations that are scrambling to get up to speed
with the new terror threat from radical, disenchanted segments of the Muslim
community. "There could be more than one cell involved here, but this means
[the intelligence services] have penetrated more than one group or the
supporting infrastructure."

Security officials had a delicate task knowing when to move, said Home
Secretary John Reid said. "Move too early, you may not know the full scope
of who is involved and you may provoke those you don't know into taking the
action you don't want. If you don't move, you run the risk of terrible
consequences."

But while the "underresourced and underappreciated" security services have
done commendable work, says M.J. Gohel, a terrorism analyst at London's Asia
Pacific Foundation, they've had less success finding out who is providing
"homegrown" terrorists with direction.

British officials regularly warn the public of the threat. Wednesday, Mr.
Reid said that the country faced its most sustained period of threat since
World War II.

Britain is a particular target because of its backing for US foreign policy
in the Middle East. RAND's Hoffman also notes that the fifth anniversary of
9/11 is looming. Despite comments that Al Qaeda may be in retreat, he says,
"nothing is further from the truth. At least in Europe, Al Qaeda has put
down an organizational structure to sustain these attacks."

 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com