[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Chance Of Canceled Flight Higher At Small Airports"
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Chance Of Canceled Flight Higher At Small Airports
The Chicago (IL) Tribune
Travelers departing small airports in states like Arkansas and Montana are
more likely to have their flight canceled than those flying from a big city,
a new government study found.
And while big and small communities experience about the same number of
flight delays, planes tend to wait longer when leaving from small airports.
The differences in cancellations and delays are due in part to economic
choices carriers make, according to the study by Todd Zinser, the
Transportation Department's acting inspector general.
Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), chairman of the Senate Aviation Subcommittee,
requested the analysis in August. The report considered two airports in
Burns' home state: Butte and Helena. Both experienced more cancellations and
longer delays than the large cities studied.
"[Burns] wants to know if small airports are being disproportionally
affected and, really, whether they're being taken advantage of," said
spokesman Matt Mackowiak.
While delays and cancellations frustrate travelers from any destination,
they can be more problematic for those coming from small airports. Those
cities have fewer airlines serving them, and carriers that do may have only
a few daily departures. During the first quarter of 2006, scheduled service
at small community airports was 17 percent lower than during the same period
in 2000, the federal study found.
In addition to economic considerations, it found other reasons for the
higher levels of cancellations at small airports. Among them: Aircraft and
navigational aids sometimes are more limited than what is available at
larger airports.
The analysis considered cancellation and delay information from 14 airports.
The data was collected in January 2005, and the level of service at some
airports has changed in the intervening 17 months.
O'Hare International was among the large airports studied. During the
monthlong period, 9.7 percent of flights from small communities to O'Hare
were canceled, while 6.8 percent of those coming from large airports were
scrapped.
Delay levels were nearly identical: 37 percent of flights coming to O'Hare
from small airports were delayed versus 36 percent from large airports. But
those coming from small cities were delayed an average 75 minutes versus an
average 70-minute delay from large communities.
Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport was among those cited in the analysis.
"We're pretty much at the mercy of the hubs our carriers are flying into and
the air traffic saturation at those hubs," said Kelly Johnson, the airport's
director. "That's what creates the ground stop. Sometimes, there's simply
not a landing spot for these guys to go into."
The Federal Aviation Administration can order flight delays and put in place
airspace restrictions in response to bad weather and other problems. But the
FAA leaves it up to the airlines when deciding which flights to cancel.
Those decisions are made after considering a host of factors, sometimes
running them through a sophisticated computer program. American Airlines
dubs its the "cancellator."
"In bad, bad weather we have a computer program that goes in and weighs all
these variables, runs it through all these algorithms and decides what's the
best to cancel," said spokeswoman Mary Frances Fagan.
Travelers sometimes worry that if they are not on a full flight, it will be
among the first to be grounded.
"You're not just looking at how full is this flight, you're looking at where
does this aircraft need to be later today, and what are bookings like for
that flight," said Sabrena Suite, spokeswoman for SkyWest, a regional
carrier for United Airlines and Delta Air Lines.
In addition to O'Hare, the large city airports the report studied were
Washington's Dulles, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Denver and Salt Lake City.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com