[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Miramar a mirage for San Diego airport developers"
Monday, January 23, 2006
Miramar a mirage for airport developers
By Logan Jenkins
The San Diego (CA) Union-Tribune
I'm sitting on the ocean-view terrace outside Del Mar's Il Fornaio, talking
with Doug Manchester about Miramar.
Miramar. It's our most frustrating civic mirage. For more than half a
century, it's been the international airport of San Diego's feverish dreams.
An experienced pilot, Manchester ticks off the comely virtues of Miramar
its astonishing size (more than 23,000 acres); the underground fuel line
from Long Beach to Miramar; easy freeway and rail access; open-space buffers
to nearby communities; virtual absence of environmental hurdles to delay
construction.
One of the shrewdest developers in a region famous for them, Manchester is
recalling how his vision of winged paradise was lost in 1994.
It was a rare window in time when Miramar Naval Air Station appeared ripe
for the taking. The Navy was packing up; the Marines, telegraphing
reservations about moving planes and helicopters south, hadn't yet arrived.
Seizing the moment, Manchester enlisted an army of business leaders and
aviation experts. The mission: persuade the Pentagon to send the Marines
someplace else and move Lindbergh Field from the harbor to an empty Miramar.
Manchester would end up spending $800,000 of his own money on the doomed
crusade.
Despite a 1994 countywide vote in favor of a civilian airport at Miramar if
the base became available, local politicians most notably Mayor Susan
Golding and former Rep. Randall Harold Cunningham undercut Manchester's
Proposition A and pushed for the Marines to move to Miramar, rendering the
public mandate moot. In short, the window closed.
Manchester still bristles at the betrayal.
"It was a horrible decision," he says. "It was a costly decision. It was the
worst decision that's ever been made in San Diego's history."
In Manchester's view, the region kissed goodbye billions of dollars in tax
money by failing to create a first-tier airport at Miramar by 2001 and
developing "some of the greatest property in the world," the roughly 500
bay-front acres where Lindbergh is today.
"It would have changed forever the economic and environmental fabric of what
we know as San Diego," he says.
Given his history, you'd expect Manchester to be a cheerleader for the San
Diego County Regional Airport Authority, which appears intent on placing an
advisory Miramar proposition on the November ballot.
Well, you'd be wrong.
"I will never vote or support anything that will endanger or compromise the
Marine Corps," Manchester says.
He sees zero incentive for the Marines, who for a decade have been putting
down tap roots on Miramar, to share their sprawling house with civilian
airliners.
Joint use is difficult but technically feasible, Manchester believes, but
unless the Marines voluntarily agree it's in their best interest to make a
deal with San Diego, he's 100 percent opposed.
Unless the window opens, count him out.
I'm sitting in the Scripps Ranch Library, listening to political aides and
community leaders one after the other declare their adamant opposition
to civilian planes at Miramar.
The NIMBYs are young and old but they're all restless.
"The airport authority is moving forward toward a site," reports Deanna
Spehn, aide to state Sen. Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego. "And it looks to a
lot of us that it's Miramar they've identified."
In these sensitive parts, it's 1994 all over again. The call to battle has
been sounded.
Scripps Ranch, Mira Mesa, Sabre Springs, Rancho Peρasquitos, Tierrasanta
Miramar's civilian neighbors show up at the library to declare their
willingness to fight to the last child, the last golden retriever.
During the meeting, Manchester's name is evoked at least five times. In this
crowd, he's the Machiavellian manipulator once again pushing the takeover of
Miramar. (Evidently, no one suspects the irony, that Manchester is billing
himself as their pro-Marines ally.)
In desperate tones, speakers attack the airport authority's fundamental
premise that Lindbergh will run out of capacity in the near future. Others
rail at joint use as unworkable. Others endorse Imperial Valley or Campo,
remote airport sites that would add many billions of dollars and several
years to the construction of an airport and mag-lev line over steep
terrain.
Some 60 people attend the meeting. I must be the only one there who can
imagine the beauty of Miramar as a civilian airport.
I keep my mouth shut and listen to the war plans.
Finally, I'm sitting by myself, thinking about Miramar.
If the language of the authority's November proposition reads something like
this The airport authority will work with the Marines to locate a
joint-use airport at Miramar the result could be similar to 1994: The
county as a whole could approve the general notion while the majority of the
city of San Diego, driven by the NIMBY turnout in District 1 and District 5,
could vote no.
But no matter what the election determines, the Marines are going to say no.
Political leaders Kehoe, Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-El Cajon, Assemblyman
George Plescia, R-Mira Mesa, Councilman Brian Maienschein and a host of
others will undercut the airport authority's dream. Once again, Miramar
will drop off the civilian radar screen.
Miramar. It's the magic carpet that every decade or so is pulled out from
under us, our noses pressed against a window that's closed.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com