[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"UAL's plan to exit bankruptcy runs into trouble"
Friday, October 14, 2005
UAL's plan to exit bankruptcy runs into trouble
Pension agency among dozens of others who object to settlement
The Associated Press
CHICAGO - The government's pension agency is among dozens of creditors and
others objecting to a key part of United Airlines' bankruptcy exit plan
ahead of a court hearing on the carrier's disclosure statement.
Opposition is coming from banks, investors, airports, unions and retired
employee groups and is typical in large corporate bankruptcies, with
creditors seeking more information as they jockey for better financial
position as United wraps up a three-year Chapter 11 restructuring.
But the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., the government's pension insurer,
also contends United's plan violates the settlement that cleared the way for
United to terminate its defined-benefit pensions this year. Its filing
became available electronically Friday, a day after it was submitted to
bankruptcy court at the filing deadline for objections.
The pension agency had dropped its resistance to United's pension
termination last April in exchange for up to $1.5 billion in notes and
convertible stock in a reorganized UAL Corp., United's holding company. Now
it says it will take up the fight again because the disclosure plan released
by United last month puts onerous restrictions on its ability to sell that
stock and will breach the agreement "if not cured to PBGC's reasonable
satisfaction."
United spokeswoman Jean Medina called the objections a normal part of the
process and said the company is continuing to work closely with the PBGC and
others.
"We expect to resolve any issues and concerns so that the court can approve
our disclosure statement next week and we can continue moving toward exit
from bankruptcy," Medina said.
While the opposition is unlikely to undo either the pensions' termination or
United's bankruptcy exit plan, it could force the airline to come up with
more money to satisfy the complaints.
"United may have to pay more cash to the PBGC and others ... and it'd be
difficult to find the money," said Bill Brandt, president and CEO of
Development Specialists Inc., a Chicago-based restructuring and management
consulting company. "They'll either have to get the banks to advance more or
go find an equity sponsor who will put enough cash in there that creditors
will get a meaningful distribution."
Comments from the PBGC on Friday suggested the differences can be bridged.
"All parties are continuing to discuss the issues involved and hope to
arrive at an amicable resolution," PBGC spokesman Jeffrey Speicher said.
The Elk Grove Village-based airline released the disclosure statement on
Sept. 7 as its blueprint for emerging from bankruptcy on Feb. 1. Its exit
financing is to come from a $3 billion all-debt package led by JPMorgan
Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.
"This is the downside of doing an all-debt plan," said Brandt.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Eugene Wedoff could rule on the disclosure plan
following Thursday's hearing, with creditors scheduled to vote in January on
whether to approve United's final reorganization plan.
United's decision to unload its four defined-benefit pension plans on the
PBGC remains the most controversial part of its restructuring. The move will
save it an estimated $645 million a year but at the expense of its
employees, since the PBGC will cover only $6.6 billion of United's $9.8
billion in unfunded pension liabilities.
"This is an undesirable and expensive precedent for U.S. taxpayers," wrote
Richard Faytinger of Sun City, Ariz., a United shareholder whose daughter is
a former flight attendant for the airline, in one of many objections filed
with the court. He called it "an unreasonable cop-out" by United Airlines
"causing reduced pension and hardship for those past loyal employees. They
were guaranteed a larger pension and should receive it."
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com