"Agency set to consider San Diego airport expansion and alternate sites"

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Agency set to consider airport expansion and alternate sites 
By Jeff Ristine
The San Diego (CA) Union-Tribune


The regional airport agency is inching closer to key decisions on the future
of Lindbergh Field and a parallel effort to identify the best site to
augment or replace it. 

By May, the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority board will have a
chance to select an option for adding 10 gates at Lindbergh Field, planners
said Monday. 

Also in May, the board will decide whether to drop one or more of the nine
sites being considered to meet the region's future air needs. The cut would
be based on findings about travel time to remote sites and how that would
affect the public's willingness to use the facility. 

The board's Strategic Planning Committee, briefed on both issues Monday,
added a month to the schedule for trimming the list of airport sites. 

Instead of being forwarded next month to the full board of directors, as
staff members suggested, the issue of accessibility and travel time will be
discussed one more time by the advisory committee. Then the strategic
planning committee will vote on the matter before moving it to the full
board in May. 

The advisory panel in February recommended dropping a proposed airport
location near Borrego Springs from further consideration. An analysis said
only 40 percent to 50 percent of air travelers would be willing to make the
drive, which is up to 2 hours and 11 minutes away for some county residents.


The advisory panel was evenly divided on whether to drop a site in the
Imperial County desert, where slightly shorter travel times are projected. 

At the time, some panel members asked why the analysis didn't consider
access by high-speed rail, which could cut travel time to either location to
a half hour. 

A preliminary answer came back Monday. Joseph Huy, head of a consulting team
on the project, told the planning committee a rail line probably would draw
only 10 percent to 15 percent of airport users, depending on where the
boarding station was. 

Gregory Wellman, also on the consulting team, noted a trend in airport
construction over the past few decades to place facilities farther from
population centers. 

"Most airports are locating more than 30 miles from (their) central business
districts," he said. 

Even so, the Borrego Springs and Imperial County options would suffer in
comparison with other airports. Among 27 U.S. airports studied, average
travel time is 60 minutes or less for 84 percent of the population they
serve. 

The analysis touches on only two other options under review: one in the East
County community of Boulevard and the possible expansion of the current
airport site. Five military installations, including Miramar Marine Corps
Air Station and North Island Naval Air Station, won't be studied until a
federal review on military base closures is completed. 

The short-term future of Lindbergh Field also is under review as the board
ponders options for maximizing its capacity. 

Airport officials want to upgrade Lindbergh even if it ultimately is
replaced. Increased air travel means the single-runway airport could
experience runway congestion as early as 2015, consultants said last year. 

Both plans would add 10 gates in a first phase, with room for more later. 

Under one plan, most of the gates would go on the western side of Terminal
2, with a few more built east of Terminal 1. Under the other, all the new
gates would be built along a concourse east of Terminal 1. 

The cost of the two options will be presented to the board in April, and the
full board will be able to select a concept to send along for environmental
review by May. State and federal review probably would extend to mid-2006.


 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************