[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Bird strikes a legal issue for Australian airports"
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Bird strikes a legal issue for airports
By Peter Morley
Australia - The Brisbane Courier Mail
AIRPORT operators that do not take steps to minimise aircraft bird strikes
have been warned they could face legal action.
Licensed airports such as Brisbane and large provincial centres are required
to manage the problem of galahs, ibis, ducks and bats.
They grow special grasses that do not attract birds, or scare them off with
sound canons, dogs or other birds of prey.
But the incidence of bird strike at licensed airports is still high, with
Queensland strips reporting eight of the 21 in Australia in the week to
March 4 to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
Four occurred in Brisbane and two in Cairns, while Mackay and Horn Island
each had one.
Each year more than 1300 incidents of aircraft hitting birds are reported,
with about 150 planes damaged. It is estimated that bird strikes cost the
airline industry nearly $1.5 billion worldwide and, since 1988, have led to
195 pilot and passenger fatalities.
A 1995 incident involving a jet taking off from the Gold Coast cost Qantas
$8 million in engine repairs and lost revenue because of rescheduling
requirements.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority yesterday warned airport operators to
manage bird strikes.
"It is possible legal action could be taken against people or organisations
that have failed to take reasonable steps to prevent birds strikes," a
spokesman said.
"All aerodromes must have a bird management strategy which gathers
information on the risk of bird strikes, counts bird numbers and develops
action plans to manage high risk species."
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com