[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Accessibility first hurdle for San Diego airport sites"
Tuesday, December 7, 2004
Accessibility first hurdle for airport sites
By GIG CONAUGHTON
The North County (CA) Times
SAN DIEGO ---- The agency in charge of finding the best place for a new
regional San Diego airport voted unanimously Monday to limit their latest
search criteria to just one question ---- can people get to it?
Having already narrowed their search of potential new airport sites from 32
to nine over the last three years, board members of the San Diego Regional
Airport Authority voted Monday to conduct a "first cut" shakedown of the
remaining sites by accessibility.
Officials said accessibility would be judged by how far the sites are from
the county's population cores, and by how congested roads and traffic
corridors leading to them are.
Authority board member William Lynch predicted that weighing the current
list of sites by how difficult they would be to get to for most San Diego
County residents would cut the list "in half or better ---- and will do so
at a very minimal cost."
With Lindbergh Field's only runway expected to be too small to handle
ever-increasing air traffic in less than a decade, the authority is trying
to find a spot to recommend for a new, or expanded, airport, to county
voters by 2006.
Authority officials said staff members would use existing San Diego
Association of Governments data to rank the accessibility of the site
locations and let board members narrow the list when they meet in February.
Angela Shafer Payne, the authority's vice president of strategic planning,
said that list would then be subjected to a "second cut" of more stringent
---- and more expensive ---- criteria, including aeronautical, environmental
and financial standards.
Shafer-Payne said the first-cut studies could be done for $10,000 to $15,000
per site. As recently as last year, authority officials estimated the final
studies could cost as much as $1 million per site. They now say they do not
know how much final studies will cost.
Shafer-Payne said Monday that staff members proposed their "first-cut"
criteria after listening to board members talk about the airport search at a
two-day board workshop last month.
She said there was a lot of discussion about increasing need for air travel
for business and cargo, because industry in San Diego County was moving from
heavy manufacturing to high technology and more businesses were flying
employees around the world to do business.
"The consensus was that travel time to and from any airport was a critical
factor in the site selection process," Shafer-Payne said.
Lynch, meanwhile, said narrowing the search by accessibility could quickly,
and cheaply, eliminate a number of potential sites.
"We will be able to see an in-depth analysis of just how impossible some of
these locations are," he said.
Some of the remaining nine sites in the hunt for a new airport are far away
from the county's population cores, including sites in Borrego Springs,
Campo, and an undetermined site in the desert of Imperial County.
The rest of the sites on the current list include a plan to expand the
existing Lindbergh Field, and five sites at military bases: March Air
Reserve Base in Riverside County; two sites at Miramar Marine Corps Air
Station in San Diego; Camp Pendleton; North Island Naval Air Station in
Coronado.
Authority officials, however, said Monday that they would not apply the
first-cut criteria studies to the five military bases.
The authority's search and study process is being funded mainly by a $5
million federal grant. And the authority has promised federal officials that
it will not study any of the military sites until Congress has finished its
latest round of hearings to determine possible base closings across the
country.
"This board has agreed to a policy that we are not going to study the
military bases until ... the Department of Defense issues their list for
closure," board chairman Joe Craver said. "We assume that will be in March,
maybe in April, maybe in May. But the deciding factor will be when the
Department of Defense issues their list. I want to make that very, very
clear."
Authority officials said the first-cut study would also not be conducted on
a site the board is still in the process of deciding whether to add to its
current list, the Corte Madera Valley site in the Cleveland National Forest,
about 45 miles east of San Diego.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com