[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Report: Majority of passengers not using express check-in options"


 
Monday, December 6, 2004

Report: Majority of passengers not using express check-in options
Awareness and comfort play role in passenger usage, satisfaction
The Associated Press


Although checking in for a flight at the airline's main counter takes
significantly longer than curbside service or self-service kiosks, less than
one-quarter of passengers take advantage of either of these express check-in
options, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2004 Global Airport
Satisfaction Index Study released Monday.

The study, now in its fifth year, measures airport satisfaction in three
segments: large (30 million or more passengers per year), medium (10 million
to less than 30 million passengers per year) and small (less than 10 million
passengers per year).

While overall satisfaction is higher among passengers who check in at
curbside, online and at self check-in kiosks, a majority (59 percent) of
passengers checks in at the main counter, which takes an average of 19
minutes. Just 18 percent use a self check-in kiosk, which averages 8
minutes, while 10 percent check in at curbside, which averages 13 minutes.
While many airlines now allow passengers to obtain their boarding pass
through the Internet, currently only 5 percent of passengers use this
option.

"Time is a prime commodity in the travel industry, and is a major factor in
influencing customer satisfaction with airports," said Linda Hirneise,
partner and executive director of travel industry research at J.D. Power and
Associates. "Even though faster options are often available to expedite the
check-in process, passengers either aren't aware of them or just aren't yet
comfortable using them. The check-in process has the greatest impact on
overall airport satisfaction. Airports need to make sure these options are
available to passengers and to continue to promote their time-saving
benefits."

Wait times at security checkpoints have increased 15 percent, from an
average of 13 minutes in 2003 to 15 minutes in 2004. By segment, the average
wait time at large airports is 16 minutes, 15 minutes at medium airports and
13 minutes at small airports. Washington-Dulles, Denver and Los Angeles are
among the airports with the longest security wait times, while Singapore,
London-Gatwick and Sydney have some of the shortest waits.

The study also finds that satisfaction is much higher with airports that
provide an environment where passengers can multi-task. This includes
services such as a wide selection of eateries and restaurants, access to
business centers, wireless Internet connections and abundant shopping. More
than one-half (54 percent) of passengers purchase food at the airport, while
37 percent shop at retail stores.

"Since September 11, safety, check-in options, security checks and the time
it takes to go through the entire airport experience have forever changed
the airport passenger experience," said Hirneise. "The keys to improving
airport satisfaction across the globe require improving passenger
facilitation, managing wait times and providing an environment where airport
passengers can be productive."

Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) ranks highest in passenger
satisfaction among large airports, performing particularly well across all
key measures of airport satisfaction. Three U.S. airports follow in the
ranking: Orlando (MCO), Denver (DEN) and Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW),
respectively.

Singapore's Changi International (SIN) ranks highest among medium-sized
airports for the third consecutive year and receives the highest overall
passenger satisfaction score in the study by a significant margin. Singapore
is followed in the rankings by Pittsburgh (PIT), Cincinnati-Northern
Kentucky (CVG) and Portland (PDX), respectively.

Overall satisfaction is significantly higher for passengers opting for small
airports, where wait times and passenger facilitation are generally more
manageable. Calgary (YYC) and San Antonio (SAT) rank highest in a tie among
small airports. Calgary performs particularly well in terminal facilities
and retail concessions, while San Antonio receives particularly high ratings
from passengers for the security check. Calgary and San Antonio are followed
in the rankings by Austin (AUS), Boise (BOI) and Indianapolis (IND),
respectively.

The 2004 Global Airport Satisfaction Index Study is based on responses from
more than 9,000 passengers who took a flight between October 2003 and
November 2004. Respondents were surveyed in six different languages and each
evaluated up to two different airports.

Attached Photo:

An airline passenger using a United Airlines Express check in machine.

041206_express_hmed_1p.hmedium.jpg


Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com