"Los Angeles agrees to pay $499.5 million to airport's neighbors"

Saturday, December 4, 2004

LA agrees to pay $499.5 million to airport's neighbors
The Associated Press


LOS ANGELES - The city has agreed to pay nearly $500 million to ease noise,
traffic and pollution problems in cities near Los Angeles International
Airport in exchange for an agreement from a coalition of community groups
not to try to block a proposed $11-billion airport expansion plan.

The agreement, which is to be announced next week, must still receive
approval from the Federal Aviation Administration.

It calls for spending $499.5 million over the next 11 to 16 years on such
projects as soundproofing schools and homes and setting up job-training
programs.

The money would come from the sale of bonds, increased airport landing fees,
terminal rents and passenger charges, as well as from airport reserve funds.

"This agreement is really revolutionary," said Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza, policy
director for Environmental Defense, one of 22 community groups that worked
out the deal with Los Angeles officials. "There are so many of us with such
different perspectives and constituencies, but we've managed to stay
together through a long and difficult process."

Other airport agencies have reached similar agreements with neighboring
cities, but none have been as wide-ranging or expensive as the proposed Los
Angeles deal. In Boston, the agency that operates Logan International
Airport has spent $41.6 million on community projects.

"We feel very strongly that this is what we should be doing," said Kim Day,
executive director of Los Angeles World Airports, the city agency that runs
Los Angeles International. "We weren't railroaded into coming up with an
agreement to keep people from suing us. We know we cause environmental
problems, and we think we should be allowed by the FAA to spend money to
make these people's lives better."

Federal officials were noncommittal about whether they would approve the
plan.

"We are going to look at this carefully and see if it just can't work for
everyone involved," said FAA spokesman Donn Walker. "We want to do what's
right for the airport. We want to do what's right for the community. And we
want to do what's right by federal practice and law."


 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************