[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Supervisors to seek delay federal review of LAX plan"


 
Tuesday, October 19, 2004  
          
Supervisors to seek delay federal review of LAX plan 
Knabe and Burke want peers' OK in asking that FAA input be tabled until any
legal challenges are resolved.
By David Zahniser and Alison Shackelford 
Copley News Service


Two Los Angeles County supervisors called Monday on the federal government
to delay any decision on a compromise plan for modernizing Los Angeles
International Airport until after any lawsuits and procedural challenges
have been resolved.

Supervisors Don Knabe and Yvonne Brathwaite Burke will ask their colleagues
today to take a position opposing efforts by the Federal Aviation
Administration to analyze or approve the LAX "consensus plan" following this
week's vote by the Los Angeles City Council.

Burke said the FAA should stay away until the city has addressed the
county's demand for a firm cap of 78.9 million annual passengers and
elimination of a proposed remote passenger check-in facility east of LAX.

"I think that we need at least six months to try and get some of these
things together," said Burke, who represents part of the South Bay.

The Los Angeles City Council will review the compromise LAX plan today, with
a vote expected Wednesday. The compromise plan was drafted as a response to
Mayor James Hahn's proposed $11 billion LAX overhaul.

The compromise would impose additional levels of review on controversial
elements of Hahn's plan, such as the remote passenger check-in facility.
Meanwhile, it would provide faster approval for $3 billion worth of airport
projects that have widespread support, such as a consolidated rental car
facility.

If the council approves the LAX plan this week, a final vote will likely be
required on Dec. 7. Los Angeles World Airports is hoping to secure final FAA
approval, known formally as the Record of Decision, or ROD, as soon as
February.

Still, FAA officials said they do not know how long it will take to issue
the ROD.

"There's no such thing as typical when you're talking about a large federal
agency and a massive public works project like this," said FAA spokesman
Donn Walker.

Knabe and Burke voiced fears that the FAA will begin work on the ROD as soon
as the council votes this week, saying such a move would be "a needless
intrusion into local affairs."

Los Angeles City Councilwoman Cindy Miscikowski said Los Angeles World
Airports and the FAA have been working together closely on the airport plan
for years, conferring on the environmental documents. Efforts to slow down
the FAA are premature, since the city is still in talks with the county and
El Segundo, Miscikowski said.

"The fact is, the FAA has been with us," she said. "The FAA said under
(former Mayor Richard) Riordan that we will agree to do this together, so I
don't think they're going to reverse course at this time."

The FAA already has received letters from U.S. Reps. Jane Harman and Maxine
Waters asking it to delay any formal action. On Monday, U.S. Rep. Howard
Berman, D-Van Nuys, said he, too, would be willing to intervene to make sure
the FAA does not "ram through its vision of what LAX should look like ...
without having the support of the local people."

"An FAA effort to jump into this before the review process is completed
would be a terrible mistake," Berman said.


 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com