[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Ridge says airport security agency will do better"


 
Wednesday, June 2, 2004

Ridge says airport security agency will do better 
By LESLIE MILLER
The Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Four key members of Congress extracted assurances from
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge on Wednesday that the government would
do a better job of protecting airports from terrorists by improving
technology and reforming the way screeners are hired. 

Ridge was summoned to the office of House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee Chairman Don Young, R-Alaska, to discuss holes in aviation
security with the House leadership on aviation issues, including Rep. James
Oberstar of Minnesota, the ranking Democrat on that committee. 

Another of the meeting's participants, Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio, said the
congressmen raised strong concerns with Ridge and other Homeland Security
officials. 

"They promised improvements," said DeFazio, the ranking Democrat on the
aviation subcommittee. 

Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the meeting resulted in a
willingness to work together to tighten aviation security. 

Rep. John Mica, chairman of the House aviation subcommittee, had demanded
the meeting in April after the Homeland Security Department's inspector
general testified that the Transportation Security Administration's airport
screeners performed poorly. 

Separate testimony by Congress' investigative arm showed the same thing --
that weapons and other dangerous items were getting through security
checkpoints. 

"Everyone came unglued," said Mica, a Florida Republican. 

Mica and DeFazio blamed outdated screening equipment for the porousness of
security checkpoints. They said the TSA needs to buy modern machines, which
are already in use on Capitol Hill and in the White House. 

"In the past two years, money has been diverted from research and
development," Mica said on Wednesday. "Some things have been developed, but
not deployed." 

Mica said he requested that a strategic plan be developed to deal with some
of the shortcomings in aviation security. In addition to the slow pace of
technological development, concerns raised at the meeting include: 

   -- The lack of a standard for biometric identification cards for people
who have access to airports, including law enforcement officers who carry
guns. 

   -- Inadequate explosive detection systems at airports. 

   -- The slow pace of integrating bomb screening machines with airport
baggage handling systems. Far fewer screeners are needed to inspect checked
baggage for bombs when the machines are integrated with the checked-bag
systems. Twelve airports received financial commitments from TSA to
integrate the machines, but Mica estimates 48 more need to do so. 

Mica, who has called the TSA a "Soviet-style, centralized bureaucracy," said
that Ridge pledged to allow more hiring, recruiting and scheduling of
airport screeners at TSA's local or regional level, instead of from
Washington. Mica believes that pushing responsibility for staffing airport
screeners away from Washington will result in fewer airports with too many
or too few screeners. 

"Reform was pledged," Mica said. 

On the Net: 

Transportation Security Administration: http://www.tsa.gov 

Homeland Security Department: http://www.dhs.gov


 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/dcfp/dcboard.php


*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com