[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
Delta Opposes FAA Plan for Salt Lake City Airport
January 7, 2004
Delta Opposes FAA Plan for Salt Lake City Airport
Salt Lake Tribune, UT
Add Delta Air Lines to the growing list of those opposed to the Federal
Aviation Administration's proposed redesign of the airspace around Salt Lake
City International Airport. How much weight it will carry is another question.
Delta, which bases its third-largest hub out of Salt Lake City, told the
FAA in a letter last month that it saw no need to expand and reconfigure routes
in and out of Salt Lake International, based upon its present flight schedules
and projected growth. The airline operates about 300 daily departures out of
Salt Lake City.
"I t's very significant that the airport's major carrier is opposing this,"
Tim Campbell, Salt Lake City International's executive director, said Tuesday.
"Delta has evaluated the issues and expressed their conclusions."
In a letter dated Dec. 17, Robert Dibblee, Delta's government and public
affairs chief for the airline's Western region wrote: "It is our experience
that air traffic flow into and out of the Salt Lake City airspace has been and
continues to be stable," adding that the expanded use of new flight management
systems and navigation procedures should comfortably accom- modate the
airline's future activities.
"Consequently," Dibblee wrote, "Delta Air Lines does not experience
measurable traffic delays that would necessitate . . . the contemplated changes
to the existing airspace structure or procedures at this time."
The FAA's proposed airspace changes, which include the possible creation of
a new corridor for arriving flights over the east bench of the Salt Lake
Valley, already faced opposition from Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson and
the City Council, as well as Rep. Jim Matheson, environmental groups, such as
Save Our Canyons, and others.
According to critics, the proposed east-side approach will not only
generate noise problems -- the new route could place arriving commercial
aircraft 6,000 feet over residents and adjacent wilderness areas -- but also
create safety concerns. General aviation users fear turbulence and extreme
weather so close to the Wasatch ridgeline.
Delta registered its opposition to the FAA proposal at the request of the
airport's board of advisers, but board members say they didn't have to twist
the airline's arm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It was more of a simple request," said Salt Lake City Councilman and board
member Carlton Christensen. "As a [city] administration and council, we've
looked for any interested parties that will support us. I think Delta looked at
its options, and for the sake of the community, decided there were viable
options that wouldn't be as impactful. I think they were being sensitive to
local concerns, while also knowing it would not be a detriment to their
operations."
Dibblee did not return a phone call Tuesday. George Wetherell, the FAA's
project leader for the Salt Lake airspace redesign, says the Delta letter
caught his office by surprise, but it will be factored into the ongoing
environmental impact assessment (EIS) for the airspace plan -- as all other
public comments have been.
How much pull Delta's position will have is the unknown.
"The major factor we'll look at is the environmental impact itself. The EIS
will direct the agency in the direction we need to go," said Wetherell.
"Delta's input will certainly be considered, as will the input of others. But
there are a lot of other things that will be taken into account. Most
importantly, there is efficiency from the airline and controller perspective,
and safety from the controller perspective. Safety is the first priority."
Christensen said he hopes the airline's stand will have an effect, but also
says he has to be realistic.
"Ultimately, the FAA will do what it feels it has to do," he said. "But
clearly, Delta is the largest generator of traffic [at the airport], so it has
significance. I don't think it will fall on deaf ears."
The EIS is scheduled to be finished by this spring.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dc/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com